Court approves $16m DASS settlementBY KARREN VERGARA | FRIDAY, 19 APR 2024 12:35PMThe Federal Court has approved the settlement reached in the $16 million class action brought against Dixon Advisory & Superannuation Services (DASS) following a two-week delay. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Janus Henderson acquires NBK Wealth, Tabula Investment Management
Janus Henderson has acquired the wealth management arm of the National Bank of Kuwait, NBK Wealth, as well as European ETF provider, Tabula Investment Management.
ART names advice and education leads
Australian Retirement Trust (ART) has revamped its advice, guidance and education team and created two new leadership roles.
Men, women in same occupation drive pay gap
A whopping 80% of the gender pay gap can be attributed to women being paid less than men within the same occupation, a new economic analysis shows.
Macquarie Group profits falls 32% to $3.52bn
Macquarie Group has reported a net profit of $3.52 billion for the year ending 31 March 2024, a 32% decrease from the previous year.
Products
Expert Feed
Why advisers should consider offering general insurance to HNW clients
I have read many articles over the years about servicing high-net-worth (HNW) clients in the financial services industry.
The role of AI in financial planning: Insights from the US
Ever since ChatGPT burst onto the scene late last year, generative AI has been front and centre of business discussions and financial planning, just like ...
Considerations when nominating a charity for your super upon death
There has been a lot of talk lately about the upcoming great wealth transfer, and you might be wondering where charities fit into all this.
The end of free money
With institutional investors prudently reassessing their risks in current market conditions and seeking safe havens in alternatives such as secured private ...
Featured Profile
Robert De Dominicis
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
GBST HOLDINGS LIMITED
GBST HOLDINGS LIMITED
It was during a family sojourn to the seaside town of Pescara, Italy, Rob DeDominicis first laid eyes on what would become the harbinger of his future. Andrew McKean writes.
Allowing beneficiary members of the Class Action to have a second bite at the compensation trough is wrong. To get to the CSLR the matter has to be an unpaid determination from AFCA.
The EDR schemes were set-up to provide a non-court based avenue for compensation and have been hi-jacked by the ambulance chasers. AFCA's own Terms of Reference effectively ban those who have negaged in legal action from accessing the scheme, but in their usual "the Rules don't apply to us if we feel like it" approach clients of DASS will have a second go at compensation funded by industry particpants that had nothing to do with the fund failures and through a scheme that is using retrospective legislation to include them.
Just another anti-adviser attitude.