Treasury releases Quality of Advice Review final reportBY CASSANDRA BALDINI, JAMIE WILLIAMSON | WEDNESDAY, 8 FEB 2023 9:11AMTrue to her word, Quality of Advice Review chair Michelle Levy's final report contains few surprises, however her recommendations include the introduction of both a Good Advice Duty and a Statutory Best Interests Duty. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Koda Capital poaches five JBWere advisers
|Five JBWere financial advisers will jump ship to Koda Capital as the latter expands its presence in Melbourne.
REIT returns to come back strong: Expert
|Higher interest rates and the post-COVID world have led to some underperformance in the real estate sector, but returns are expected to get back to their historic levels, according to one expert.
VFMC hires client portfolio design head
|Victoria Funds Management Corporation (VFMC) named a new head of client portfolio design who joined this week.
Market pessimism over Insignia 'overblown'
|Sluggish flows, restructuring challenges and deteriorating debt coverage may have investors spooked, but one analyst says it's not all bad.
Products
Featured Profile
Matt Gaden
HEAD OF AUSTRALIA
JANUS HENDERSON INVESTORS (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
JANUS HENDERSON INVESTORS (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
Helping investors traverse financial markets and build their wealth during the peaks and troughs is Janus Henderson Investors head of Australia Matt Gaden's game plan. He tells Karren Vergara why in this long game of investing, active management wins.
Basically, reads that the current laws and FASEA standards apply to Qualified advisors who give personal advice. Industry and large retail Superannuation funds trustees are able to employ non-qualified persons to give personal advice and not be held to by FASEA standards or best interest duty. So, the Government of the day paid large sum of money to an organisation to write a report to ignore the recommendations of a royal commission.
Whilst the Govt is on the job of reinstating the ability for sales staff employed by the banks and super funds to provide conflicted product sales advice with qualifications from the back of a Weeties packet, could they at least do the honourable thing and also refund to me the thousands of dollars of costs (including professional time costs) they have charged me over the last 5 years to: Complete and pass the FASEA financial adviser exam, maintain my existing CPD & related qualifications, not to mention the exorbitant ASIC levy and Tax Practitioner Board (TPB) registration fees that as a small business / sole practitioner I have been forced to pay (both being fees paid to the Govt for no service). Thanks.