Industry, APRA mull super merger costsBY JAMIE WILLIAMSON | THURSDAY, 17 SEP 2020 12:39PMSuperannuation industry stakeholders are in talks with the prudential regulator to devise a lower cost option for fund mergers, with smaller funds currently facing the potential of being priced out of merger opportunities. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Another corporate fund bites the dust
|The Nissan Superannuation Plan will be wound up on July 31, almost 50 years on from its creation.
Spaceship appoints new chief risk officer
|Spaceship has tapped a former ASIC and APRA operative to be its new chief risk officer.
Seven fund managers scoop up First Sentier mandates
|Colonial First State (CFS) flags it will appoint seven new managers to take over several mandates that will be vacated by First Sentier Investments (FSI) following the shock closure of four local investment teams.
LGT Crestone launches new investment solution
|LGT Crestone has introduced a new investment solution for its clients, offering access to alternatives.
Products
Featured Profile
Matt Gaden
HEAD OF AUSTRALIA
JANUS HENDERSON INVESTORS (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
JANUS HENDERSON INVESTORS (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
Helping investors traverse financial markets and build their wealth during the peaks and troughs is Janus Henderson Investors head of Australia Matt Gaden's game plan. He tells Karren Vergara why in this long game of investing, active management wins.
There are a couple of contributing factors. Firstly, most super funds, and especially small to medium size have poor data management which makes initial due diligence and then actual merging expensive. Some smaller funds may get "left on the shelf". Secondly, funds are merging one at a time. We haven't yet seen (I think) the "mega merge" with multiple (ie. more than 2) funds merging together at the same time. Admittedly this will be daunting to many but if economies of scale are a reason for merging, then there can be economies obtained in merging multiple instances at the same time.