Court approves $16m DASS settlementBY KARREN VERGARA | FRIDAY, 19 APR 2024 12:35PMThe Federal Court has approved the settlement reached in the $16 million class action brought against Dixon Advisory & Superannuation Services (DASS) following a two-week delay. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Equip Super awards custody mandate
|Equip Super has selected a new custodian and back-office administrator to replace NAB Asset Servicing.
SMSFs' use of advisers plummets: Research
|The number of self-managed super funds (SMSFs) using advisers has reached a new low, with the proportion of SMSFs using advisers falling to 23% from 27% in the past 12 months, according to a Vanguard/Investment Trends report.
Financial services firms concerned about attracting staff
|New research from Robert Half suggests 74% of the finance industry is concerned about their ability to attract and retain staff.
ASIC issues experienced pathway guidance
|ASIC has released new guidance for financial advisers who could potentially qualify as experienced providers and skip further education and training.
Products
Featured Profile
Matt Gaden
HEAD OF AUSTRALIA
JANUS HENDERSON INVESTORS (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
JANUS HENDERSON INVESTORS (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
Helping investors traverse financial markets and build their wealth during the peaks and troughs is Janus Henderson Investors head of Australia Matt Gaden's game plan. He tells Karren Vergara why in this long game of investing, active management wins.
Allowing beneficiary members of the Class Action to have a second bite at the compensation trough is wrong. To get to the CSLR the matter has to be an unpaid determination from AFCA.
The EDR schemes were set-up to provide a non-court based avenue for compensation and have been hi-jacked by the ambulance chasers. AFCA's own Terms of Reference effectively ban those who have negaged in legal action from accessing the scheme, but in their usual "the Rules don't apply to us if we feel like it" approach clients of DASS will have a second go at compensation funded by industry particpants that had nothing to do with the fund failures and through a scheme that is using retrospective legislation to include them.
Just another anti-adviser attitude.