Small licensees are PI insurance compliant: ASICBY KARREN VERGARA | WEDNESDAY, 30 AUG 2017 12:26PMThe majority of small Australian financial services licensees are meeting professional indemnity (PI) insurance obligations, according to an ASIC investigation. Related News |
Editor's Choice
The top investment funds over the past year
|The top-performing investment funds for the year ending March 31 have been announced, with all being ETFs focused on international equities.
AFCA finds more Dixon Advisory victims
|The Australian Financial Complaints Authority added 544 more Dixon Advisory-specific victims to total 2492 complaints at the end of April, which will further exacerbate the levy financial advisers must pay.
Senior Cbus investment manager exits
|Cbus' head of total portfolio management has left the fund, while a former JANA executive has joined its infrastructure team.
Quality of retirement does not depend on super balance: Bragg
|The Senate Economics Committee has released its interim report into using super for housing.
Products
Featured Profile
Robert De Dominicis
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
GBST HOLDINGS LIMITED
GBST HOLDINGS LIMITED
It was during a family sojourn to the seaside town of Pescara, Italy, Rob DeDominicis first laid eyes on what would become the harbinger of his future. Andrew McKean writes.
The statement that the majority of small licensees are meeting their PI obligation is farcical given that the vast majority when requesting cover ask for "the lowest premium possible". When asked what do they want the answer in the majority of cases is "the cheapest".
It is even becoming very regular that the licensees are asking for quotations on larger and larger excesses so as to reduce the premiums. This does not ensure protection for the consumer.
Recently excesses of $500,000 any one claim was requested by a company with $1 million turnover. What is the regulated formula for complying cover please.