Aust super system failing retireesBY LINDA HAUSKEN | WEDNESDAY, 3 OCT 2012 12:05PMAustralia is headed for a retirement savings disaster, with increasing numbers of baby boomers resorting to the aged pension after spending their entire superannuation to pay off debt, a CPA Australia study has shown. |
Editor's Choice
JPMAM, iCapital launch new private market fund for wholesale investors
J.P. Morgan Asset Management (JPMAM) and iCapital have launched a new Australian domiciled fund designed to afford wholesale investors access to small to mid-market private equity opportunities.
Betashares captures most net flows in managed funds industry
Betashares has commandeered the top spot for net flows among all investment managers in the managed funds industry.
ASIC appeals judge's call to not penalise Block Earner
ASIC is appealing the Federal Court's recent decision to not issue a penalty to Block Earner after it was found to have provided unlicensed financial services.
Average super balances fall
Australian Taxation Office data found the average super balance has fallen, as it also revealed the highest paid professions in the nation.
Further Reading
![]() | Know the facts about lifetime annuitiesSaving for a happy retirement is Australia's #1 financial goal. Learn how LifeIncome can deliver more income, certainty, & choice. |
Products
Featured Profile
![Phil Usher](https://media.financialstandard.com.au/prod/media/library/Contacts/cwyzorar-0002_featured_profile.png)
Phil Usher
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
FIRST NATIONS FOUNDATION
FIRST NATIONS FOUNDATION
Taking a gamble to steady the ship as chief executive of First Nations Foundation, Phil Usher has turned it into a more secure, self sustaining entity, far better equipped to empower First Nations people to achieve financial prosperity. Andrew McKean writes.
Better off investing it in my own name until I'm 10 years out from preservation age and know what the policies affecting my super will look like.
No chance I'll let the government commandeer my savings to fund city-building projects with crappy returns.
This sort of 'Can't trust people with their own money, better dole it out to them bit by bit' thinking is not helping at all. My life expectancy based on family health history could be 75, my best mate comes from a line of people who have consistently lived to over 100. Why should someone else dictate that we can both only access 5% of our super per year (for example) just because financial illiteracy is widespread with others?
It could be a smart decision for government to pay for or subsidise two fee for service assessments by qualified financial advisers of all retirees transitioning from accumulation to distribution of super savings. There are often legitimate capital needs for new retirees. In most instances I would have thought, retirees use their lump sums to create an income stream as intended, for their continued support.
As a former Financial Planner, the impression I gained was that the great majority of people who ended up with reasonable sums of money for Retirement were those who received benefits from compulsory Superannuation schemes that required them to also contribute (usually a minimum of 5% of income). Others received this PLUS redundancy payments. The actual number of "self funded" Retirees (those who took determined wealth creation actions of their own accord), are very few as a percentage of the population. The primary problem of the current system is that no Politician has the courage to make the decisions necessary (substantially increase contributions, including imposing member contributions) as they are ALL driven by the "need" to be elected or re-elected above all other considerations, not by what is best for the country. Workers in Singapore have to contribute 20% of earnings (plus employer contributions)! Go figure! Also, when the Government promotes debt as being good, what hope when "leadership" shows the wrong objectives?
Its interesting to note the push for further taking away a persons right to choose by making the comment we should use' compulary' income streams in retirement. In my opinion, this will simply make the problem worse and people less likely to save via super if we now dictate what and how they use their own money they worked so hard to save for. And where has he gained the evidence that people are using the lump sum as a 'windfall'?. In fact the recent whitepaper by the actuaries institute on 'Australia's Longevitiy Tsunami" states that there is absolutely no evidence to date that people are taking their lump sums out at retirement.
We need to educate, encourage and simplify a complex set of rules, and remember we live in a democracy which gives us a right to choose and the big stick approach does not sit well with the wider community.
The Federal Government needs to re-evaluate the tax haven status of the family home, free from any assessment by Centrelink, individuals are pouring money into the principal residence, incurring debts, then using the Superannuation to pay of the debt.