AFA defends industry against Labor attackBY KARREN VERGARA | MONDAY, 21 JUN 2021 12:28PMThe Association of Financial Advisers has slammed the Labor Party's attack on financial advisers, which paints the profession as dodgy and continues to rip-off consumers. Related News |
Editor's Choice
JPMAM, iCapital launch new private market fund for wholesale investors
|J.P. Morgan Asset Management (JPMAM) and iCapital have launched a new Australian domiciled fund designed to afford wholesale investors access to small to mid-market private equity opportunities.
Betashares captures most net flows in managed funds industry
|Betashares has commandeered the top spot for net flows among all investment managers in the managed funds industry.
ASIC appeals judge's call to not penalise Block Earner
|ASIC is appealing the Federal Court's recent decision to not issue a penalty to Block Earner after it was found to have provided unlicensed financial services.
Average super balances fall
|Australian Taxation Office data found the average super balance has fallen, as it also revealed the highest paid professions in the nation.
Further Reading
Sponsored by | Know the facts about lifetime annuitiesSaving for a happy retirement is Australia's #1 financial goal. Learn how LifeIncome can deliver more income, certainty, & choice. |
Products
Featured Profile
Phil Usher
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
FIRST NATIONS FOUNDATION
FIRST NATIONS FOUNDATION
Taking a gamble to steady the ship as chief executive of First Nations Foundation, Phil Usher has turned it into a more secure, self sustaining entity, far better equipped to empower First Nations people to achieve financial prosperity. Andrew McKean writes.
I don't completely disagree with the parliamentarian's comments and as an adviser of almost 40 years, I have seen so much of what she referred to. No one says ALL advisers are shonky - like no one hates ALL lawyers - but enough are/do to make it fair comment. The problems that may arise need to be dealt with rather than ignored or worse, taken as personal insults.
Regulation must consider what may go wrong as well as what may go right - that's the whole point of regualtion. Jumping on every adverse comment without offering constructive criticism, or - better - a solution - is childish. That's one of the reasons I'm getting out of this business. I've not particularly enjoyed the company of far too many in it who've done little to enhance the status or the reputation of what should be a wonderful way to help people, but has been too exploitative for far too long.
The best antidote to unintended adverse comment is to take the air out of its sails - and ignore it. Good luck Philip (Carman) - a pity you're not staying on to help repair the damage to which Ms McAllister makes reference.