Westpac weighs in on FoFA debateBY LAURA MILLAN | FRIDAY, 9 MAY 2014 11:25AMWestpac said that the government's proposed changes to the Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) legislation are "necessary" to ensure consumer protection. Related News |
Editor's Choice
AustralianSuper ups admin fees
|The $430 billion superannuation fund is increasing its administration fees for the first time since 2022.
Advice complaints see biggest increase in FY26: AFCA
|Despite only accounting for less than 10% of the total complaints lodged, investment and advice complaints have seen the steepest increase in FY26, data from AFCA shows.
BUSSQ ups insurance cover, costs
|BUSSQ members will see the cost of their death and TPD cover increase as the fund increases the level of default cover.
Apostle names new head of distribution
|Apostle Funds Management has named a new head of distribution shortly after securing its chief executive.
Videos
Brought to you by ![]()
Further Reading
Products
Expert Feed
When geopolitics becomes a portfolio risk
Geopolitics is back - again - and Australian investors can no longer treat it as distant background noise.
Does association membership still matter?
With all the changes the advice sector has experienced in recent years, such as regulatory reform and increased education and professional standards ...
Digital assets and where they stand in 2026
So far in 2026 digital assets have captured the headlines largely for the wrong reasons, but that doesn't tell the full story.
Rethinking default design in a changing market environment
The evolution underway in the US DC system highlights the value of periodically reassessing default design assumptions.
Featured Profile
Hugh Killen
MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY LIMITED
AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY LIMITED
For Hugh Killen, several life lessons came from spending time on pastoral properties stretching across northern New South Wales and South-West Queensland.
The Financial Standard podcast Tune in each week as we discuss the latest developments in Australia's wealth management industry. |  |
The only "high level of uncertainty" the removal of the catch-all requirement to act solely in the client's best interest is that created in the Bank's mind - not the consumers!
As to Westpac's proposition that the watering-down of the FoFA requirements is "necessary to ensure consumer protection", I'd only encourage the Senate Committee to jump on IView and watch what last Monday's Four Corners expose on the CBA's version of consumer protection.
Lets be clear, crystal clear. General advice from an untrained branch teller, remunerated by commission IS NOT 'advice' that any consumer wants or needs, regardless of how 'cheap' it appears to be.
The ability to sell all manner of financial products to the public, through staff even less qualified than the financial advisers (for which training and qualifications are already constant source of industry embarrassment). Pay them a commission to do so and then if anything goes wrong "oh, it was general advice only we are not responsible". Wow, practically a lotto win for financial institutions?
Anyone within the world of banking and finance understands this, therefore statements to the contrary are just conflicted interest nonsense. The only people making such statements..... surprise surprise are those who stand to profit from it. Every other bank has thus far had the smarts to keep their mouth shut and lobby in private, not so for Westpac it seems.