Breaking Australia's love affair with the lump sumBY JAMES FERNYHOUGH | MONDAY, 29 JUL 2013 11:55AMAs the population ages, Australians will have to move away from lump sum super payments and towards income streams, a trend that will demand bold policy changes |
Editor's Choice
Vale Garry Wyatt
|Garry Wyatt, the co-founder and chief executive of Insync Funds Management, has sadly passed away.
NRF appoints inaugural chief investment officer
|The National Reconstruction Fund has named its first chief investment officer.
First Bitcoin ETF to launch this week on ASX
|VanEck will make history this week as the first investment manager to launch a Bitcoin ETF on the ASX.
More Aussies anticipate renting in retirement: Vanguard
|An increasing number of Australians expect to be paying off a mortgage or forced to rent in retirement, according to the latest Vanguard How Australia Retires survey.
Further Reading
Sponsored by | Know the facts about lifetime annuitiesSaving for a happy retirement is Australia's #1 financial goal. Learn how LifeIncome can deliver more income, certainty, & choice. |
Products
Featured Profile
Phil Usher
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
FIRST NATIONS FOUNDATION
FIRST NATIONS FOUNDATION
Taking a gamble to steady the ship as chief executive of First Nations Foundation, Phil Usher has turned it into a more secure, self sustaining entity, far better equipped to empower First Nations people to achieve financial prosperity. Andrew McKean writes.
What a load of rubbish by Pauline Vamos! The general population has had enough of Government interfering with superannuation and we don't want ASFA advocating more changes which will obviously benefit the super funds by trying to keep money in super and therefore contribute to their own bottom line.
With greater longevity than ever before, the consumption curve in the post retirement can seldom be smooth if the limpsums supersede the draw down. The biggest dent to pension is Inflation and unless the draw down is indexed, it makes very little sense to have the same. While one survives 25 years in retirement, the lumpsum would certainly not last, nor would the draw down at a 20 years old rate and hence the indexation is a must.
Everyone prefers to have 'a bird in hand rather than in bushes' and hence with no guarantee of indexed draw down and also of survival prefer the lump. Nevertheless, times have changed and with higher life expectancy at 60 for the current generation, the question is not longevity but 'Healthy Longevity' as most of the old age expenditure goes medical.