ASIC issues warning over Dover advisersBY JAMIE WILLIAMSON | WEDNESDAY, 13 JUN 2018 12:46PMAdvice licensees considering onboarding ex-Dover Financial Advisers' authorised representatives have been warned to ramp up due diligence processes by the corporate regulator. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Blackwattle takes over Quest Asset Partners
Blackwattle Investment Partners has swallowed up Australian equities manager Quest Asset Partners for an undisclosed sum.
Funds SA poaches Vision Super risk specialist
Funds SA will welcome a Vision Super executive to replace executive director, governance and strategy Tony Burrill, as he prepares for retirement following a seven-year tenure at the company.
Regal flags muted second-half performance fees
Regal Partners expects to recognise at least $122.7 million in fund performance fee revenue for calendar 2026, with market volatility and weaker investment performance limiting the prospect of further material fees in the second half.
Insignia chief draws 'hard line' on NCAs giving retirement advice
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley said he draws a hard line when it come to the new class of advisers (NCAs) giving retirement advice.
Further Reading
Products
Expert Feed
Featured Profile

Fiona Macgregor
GROUP CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND MANAGING DIRECTOR
TAL LIMITED
TAL LIMITED
Fiona Macgregor has risen through the ranks at TAL, taking the top job in 2024, but her life was touched by the insurance sector long before her tenure with the life insurer began. Eliza Bavin writes.







Now being retired, but having spent 50 years looking after the financial security of many hundreds of clients - typical, everyday Australians - I see the present, heavy-handed, neo-vindictive attitude of ASIC (at least, certain 'power wielders' in ASIC) as a real threat to the financial security and well-being of the majority of those everyday Australians whose interests it purports to protect.
ASIC's attitude and practices effectively jeopardise the delivery of much-needed services by firstly demonising those in daily contact with, and who look after the interests of, their clients, and secondly by the imposition of a compliance regime that holds process above the delivery of empathetic, creative and beneficial financial planning services.
This is not to say that ASIC does not have a necessary, indeed noble, purpose. But it's present policy of guilty until proven innocent, does nothing to uphold that noble purpose; in fact, quite the contrary.
The present debacle of ASIC's closure of Dover Financial, and in consequence - but far more importantly - the denial of access to the normal, everyday financial services provided by the 400 Dover advisers, must undoubtably compute to at least 20,000 (that's only an average of 50 clients per adviser, so the number could be far higher) Clients' being denied the assistance they would otherwise be receiving. And - in case not considered relevant by ASIC - it happens to be Financial Year-end!
One can only imagine the many offices of the (now rendered impotent) advisers, with their staff's not being able to assist their thousands of needy clients, and indeed now wondering about their own financial security.
Justified ASIC may be, in closing Dover. But to assume a guilty verdict on all 400 Advisers, thus denying the delivery of everyday services to their tens of thousands of clients, cannot be justified.
Imagine closing all the branches of a bank because someone at head office had done the wrong thing.