Industry, APRA mull super merger costsBY JAMIE WILLIAMSON | THURSDAY, 17 SEP 2020 12:39PMSuperannuation industry stakeholders are in talks with the prudential regulator to devise a lower cost option for fund mergers, with smaller funds currently facing the potential of being priced out of merger opportunities. Related News |
Editor's Choice
AustralianSuper engages TAL to create retirement option
The new option is expected to be available in early 2025.
Lombard Odier brings plastic circularity fund down under
Lombard Odier Investment Managers (LOIM) is bringing its Plastic Circularity Fund to Australia, following a first close last year with backing from the sovereign wealth fund of Monaco, among others.
Treasury releases draft legislation for new $3m super tax
The SMSF Association has slammed the proposed changes, claiming it will result in more red tape, costs and unexpected outcomes.
Castlerock embarks on $30m capital raise
Property fund manager Castlerock is aiming to raise $30 million to expand its portfolio focused on government-leased assets.
Products
Featured Profile
Brian Parker
CHIEF ECONOMIST
AUSTRALIAN RETIREMENT TRUST
AUSTRALIAN RETIREMENT TRUST
To Brian Parker, the best investment ideas are the ones that make common sense. As chief economist of Australian Retirement Trust, Parker combines his analytical prowess and interpersonal skills to better member education and outcomes. Chloe Walker writes.
There are a couple of contributing factors. Firstly, most super funds, and especially small to medium size have poor data management which makes initial due diligence and then actual merging expensive. Some smaller funds may get "left on the shelf". Secondly, funds are merging one at a time. We haven't yet seen (I think) the "mega merge" with multiple (ie. more than 2) funds merging together at the same time. Admittedly this will be daunting to many but if economies of scale are a reason for merging, then there can be economies obtained in merging multiple instances at the same time.