Westpac weighs in on FoFA debateBY LAURA MILLAN | FRIDAY, 9 MAY 2014 11:25AMWestpac said that the government's proposed changes to the Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) legislation are "necessary" to ensure consumer protection. Related News |
Editor's Choice
WAM active strategy delivers 75.5%
WAM Active (ASX: WAA), one of Wilson Asset Management's active listed investment companies, has recorded 75.5% in investment performance in the 12 months to 30 June 2026.
Entireti names former Perpetual chief as chair
Entireti has named a former chief executive of Perpetual as chair of its board.
Super funds fail customer service test: SCA
Superannuation funds are apathetic, dismissive and continue to fail members at the most basic service level, a new investigation from Super Consumers Australia (SCA) reveals, which slapped the industry with an overall failing grade on customer satisfaction.
KKR joins consortium to acquire ASX-listed Steadfast
Global investment firm KKR has joined a consortium, including Amwins Group and Dragoneer Investment Group, as a co-lead investment partner to acquire ASX-listed general insurance broker Steadfast.
Products
Expert Feed
When geopolitics becomes a portfolio risk
Geopolitics is back - again - and Australian investors can no longer treat it as distant background noise.
Does association membership still matter?
With all the changes the advice sector has experienced in recent years, such as regulatory reform and increased education and professional standards ...
Digital assets and where they stand in 2026
So far in 2026 digital assets have captured the headlines largely for the wrong reasons, but that doesn't tell the full story.
Rethinking default design in a changing market environment
The evolution underway in the US DC system highlights the value of periodically reassessing default design assumptions.
Featured Profile
Blake Briggs
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
FINANCIAL SERVICES COUNCIL
FINANCIAL SERVICES COUNCIL
Since becoming chief executive, Blake Briggs has renewed the Financial Services Council's influence, expanded the membership base, and strengthened its policy and advocacy credentials. Karren Vergara writes.
The only "high level of uncertainty" the removal of the catch-all requirement to act solely in the client's best interest is that created in the Bank's mind - not the consumers!
As to Westpac's proposition that the watering-down of the FoFA requirements is "necessary to ensure consumer protection", I'd only encourage the Senate Committee to jump on IView and watch what last Monday's Four Corners expose on the CBA's version of consumer protection.
Lets be clear, crystal clear. General advice from an untrained branch teller, remunerated by commission IS NOT 'advice' that any consumer wants or needs, regardless of how 'cheap' it appears to be.
The ability to sell all manner of financial products to the public, through staff even less qualified than the financial advisers (for which training and qualifications are already constant source of industry embarrassment). Pay them a commission to do so and then if anything goes wrong "oh, it was general advice only we are not responsible". Wow, practically a lotto win for financial institutions?
Anyone within the world of banking and finance understands this, therefore statements to the contrary are just conflicted interest nonsense. The only people making such statements..... surprise surprise are those who stand to profit from it. Every other bank has thus far had the smarts to keep their mouth shut and lobby in private, not so for Westpac it seems.