Super concessions cost $32bn in 2011-12BY ALEX DUNNIN | FRIDAY, 1 FEB 2013 12:10PMThe total cost of superannuation tax concessions climbed 10.5% in 2011-12 to reach a record $32.4 billion, according to the just released Tax Expenditures Statements. |
Editor's Choice
Advice veteran's exit creates $1bn Tassie wealth group
Mancell Financial Group (MFG) founder Peter Mancell has retired as a financial adviser after 46 years, selling the business he built to pave the way for a $1 billion wealth management firm in Tasmania.
UniSuper, Aware Super deliver positive returns
UniSuper and Aware Super have reported returns across all investment options for the 2025-26 financial year.
HESTA executive jumps ship to Cbus
A C-suite executive from HESTA has taken on a new role as chief member officer at Cbus, effective October.
ASFA strengthens cyber security with new hire
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has named its head of cyber and financial crime, bringing relevant experience from a super fund.
Products
Featured Profile

Judith Fiander
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AUSTRALIAN PHILANTHROPIC SERVICES
AUSTRALIAN PHILANTHROPIC SERVICES
When Judith Fiander first walked in the doors of Australian Philanthropic Services her intention was to volunteer for a few months. Fast forward 14 years and she is the chief executive. Eliza Bavin writes.







I guess we should be glad they don't steal it all.
To refer to 'Superannuation tax concession costs" as costs is a complete fabrication of the truth. What is really meant is that instead of taxing the income earnings at marginal tax rates the contribution tax is only taking 15%. If there were no concessions for placing money into superannuation then Canberra would manage to get their hands on far more income in the short term. My understanding was that these tax concessions were implemented to provide an incentive for the average person to place money into their superannuation to allow for some degree of income in their retirement rather than rely on the age pension. The average government in this country has a forecasting plan that resembles the amount of time that they are in power before the general electorate actually wakes up to the lies and deceit and eventually throws them out. DO US ALL A FAVOUR AND DON"T KEEP CHANGING THE SUPERANNUATION RULES!
Kym I agree with you and you're right for the most part. But to say there is no cost may not be completely accurate either. I guess where it can become a cost is if the forgone income from the tax concessions becomes greater then the expense of government pensions.
Surely, after working for more than 45 years, raising four kids as a single mother and sacrificing lifestyle to put money into super and thus disqualifying myself from being eligible for the age pension, I DESERVE PEACE OF MIND!
As to lump sum payments, as certain as night follows day, there will be times in the next 30 years when I will need to draw down a lump sum to cover major household expenditure, I need to be able to draw down the money and without being penalised for doing so!
If super money is taxed at the same rate as other income or with a reduced concession, there is no point of saving within super for retirement as there are far better investment vehicles available without the heavy regulation super is subjected to. This also applies to retirees, as it appears that taxation will be extended to retirement earnings and withdrawals as well.
Furthermore, because nasties such as this are dumped on us on budget night and effective just prior to the announcement, it makes me rather nervous and I am increasingly inclined to withdraw all of my super savings before May.