SMSFs retarding growth in Australia: Credit SuisseBY LAURA MILLAN | WEDNESDAY, 29 JAN 2014 12:50PMSelf-managed super funds (SMSFs) "are retarding growth in Australia" by controlling much of the equity that could be used for new investment and demanding dividend increases instead. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Treasury responds to Debelle's review into the AOFM
|Treasury has responded to the Guy Debelle-led review into the Australian Office of Financial Management (AOFM), agreeing to all six recommendations.
Bravura ups guidance, reports earnings increase
|Bravura Solutions informed investors cost discipline will protect its full year earnings result after a client migrated to a Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) early in the year.
MaxCap hires from Vanguard, AustralianSuper
|MaxCap has welcomed two senior directors, including a portfolio manager from Australia's largest super fund, reporting to the recently named chief executive Kylie Robb.
Zenith snags mandate from Granite Bay
|Granite Bay Private Wealth has selected Zenith Investment Partners to support their investment governance and due diligence.
Products
Featured Profile

Blake Briggs
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
FINANCIAL SERVICES COUNCIL
FINANCIAL SERVICES COUNCIL
Since becoming chief executive, Blake Briggs has renewed the Financial Services Council's influence, expanded the membership base, and strengthened its policy and advocacy credentials. Karren Vergara writes.







Isn't this just a reflection of an ageing and increasingly retired population that is more interested in income than growth?
It has actually been companies choosing to pay higher dividends as they view that expansionary measures are too costly at the moment. This is certainly true in the mining sector. Business expansion should only ever be targeted where it can be done at a profit.
The other reason for demanding income return along the way is that the investment market can be so volatile these days that you need investment return along the way, not just when you sell the asset.
Corporate bonds are a product subject to capital value movements whilst coupon returns are subject to RBA benchmarks. Also corporate bonds don't have the trading flexibility that shares do.