No proof of member benefit: APRA on super fund spendsBY JAMIE WILLIAMSON | TUESDAY, 26 OCT 2021 12:44PMAPRA has found instances of expenditure by superannuation funds that does not meet the best financial interests of members, including sponsorship deals and advertising spends with no evidence of member benefit. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Advisers lean on AQF7 to meet education standards: Rainmaker
A new report indicates that Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF) 7 qualifications are the most common forms of qualification among financial advisers, held by 85% of the population.
Labor commits to compulsory super for under-18 workers
Labor has unanimously supported extending superannuation to under-18 Australian workers.
Trump slugs Australia with new 'forced-labour' tariffs
US President Donald Trump will slug trading partners, including Australia, with new tariffs of 10% to 12.5% on the premise of pressuring foreign governments to strengthen bans on "the importation of goods produced with forced labour."
Centuria quashes governance allegations amid fund downgrades
Centuria Capital Group has swiftly provided a response to media reports suggesting that its exposure to the Bathla Group, a Sydney-based property constructor and developer, raised questions over its governance, following a downgrade of one of its private credit funds this week.
Further Reading
Products
Featured Profile

Hugh Killen
MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY LIMITED
AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY LIMITED
For Hugh Killen, several life lessons came from spending time on pastoral properties stretching across northern New South Wales and South-West Queensland.







About time. It's inconceivable that sponsoring a footy team is going to provide a return to members. Will members have recourse to demand those funds are returned? After all, reading this article suggests that the trustees have a lot to answer for.
How about naming the offenders ?? I reckon i can guess three off the top of my head