Estate agents to become RG146 certifiedBY JAMIE WILLIAMSON | TUESDAY, 14 MAR 2017 12:24PMReal estate agents who provide financial advice around property investment can now undertake a new training course as part of a wider strategy to professionalise the industry. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Australian dividend distributions rebound in Q3
|Australia saw a significant rebound in dividend distributions in the quarter to September 30, with the recovery attributable to BHP and the broader mining sector.
Aequitas hires from Vanguard again
|Aequitas Investment Partners has named a head of asset consulting, joining from Vanguard Australia.
RBA delivers another hike in split decision
|The Reserve Bank of Australia delivered its fifth interest rate hike this year, but the monetary board was split in its decision.
Sequoia profits tank as advisers flee
|Sequoia's Q1 revenue dropped close to 60% while also recording a profit loss. Despite this former chief executive Garry Crole took home more than $400k.
Further Reading
Products
Expert Feed
Featured Profile

Jacqueline Fernley
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
Jacqueline Fernley is a self-confessed nerd, a market animal and as of this year, her own boss. Riddhima Talwani writes.







This is utterly unacceptable.
As we all know the number of property developers and real estate agents that have used the line 'ideal investment for your SMSF" to act as a carrot for a sale when not understanding a minuscule component of the complexities of SMSF advice has been rife and extremely dangerous.
So, after 20 hours of online training, a real estate agent that has been in business for 5 minutes will be able to provide both general and factual advice on securities and derivatives?
This is nothing more than an quick fix option to allow the property "investment" seminar operators and the spruikers to continue to run their very dangerous race and misadvise thousands of people.
Real Estate agents have continued to openly use terms such as " fantastic investment opportunity" or "unique investment potential" for years, but compared to what?
I suggest that any advertisement such as these is already giving general advice without substance and certainly does not qualify as appropriate personalised advice to a potential buyer.
I suggest Real Estate agents giving general advice on any aspect of financial services is questionable.
Yes I totally agree, #ASIC has been so slack in keeping the real estate industry in check about using the word "#Investment". this is the old saying "give them in inch and they will take a mile" this just gives them a legal way to do what they have been doing for years, misleading clients into believing that property is the only way....., come on #ASIC step in here and say NO this is not good enough.
Also totally agree with Craig's comments. How in running an advertisement can anyone use terms such "ideal investment, "fantastic investment opportunity" or "ideal for SMSF?"
Ideal and fantastic for whom? The negative gearer? The elderly person looking to boost retirement income? The SMSF Trustee with too much cash but with a conservative and low risk profile?
How can an estate agent then sell a property after only providing factual and/or general advice? Doesn't the property then become a financial product, meaning a Statement of Advice should be prepared? Especially if the funds are coming out of an investment product for the purchase. Replacement advice with full comparisons of risks and fees, including rates, insurances, rental agent fees etc.