SMSF popularity belies fickle performanceBY MARK SMITH | MONDAY, 14 JAN 2013 12:15PMInvestors who turned to DIY super funds on the promise of superior returns may be getting less than they bargained for, new Rainmaker research shows. |
Editor's Choice
APRA investigating Diversa's executive compensation
APRA has commenced an investigation into if Diversa's executive remuneration decisions were made in accordance with prudential standards and trustees' duties under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act.
Kudu continues Australian expansion with fresh investment
Kudu Investment Management has acquired a minority stake in a Sydney-based financial advisory business mere days after an identical transaction with Drummond Capital Partners.
Apex takes on Mercer's NZ fund admin business
Apex Group has expanded its presence in New Zealand, agreeing to onboard Mercer New Zealand's fund administration operations as part of its broader growth strategy across Australasia.
Aware Super ups stake in retirement village asset
Aware Super has increased its ownership in Keyton, Australia's largest owner and operator of retirement villages, to 75% by acquiring Lendlease's interest of 25.1%.
Products
Featured Profile

Brian Redican
CHIEF ECONOMIST
NEW SOUTH WALES TREASURY CORPORATION
NEW SOUTH WALES TREASURY CORPORATION
What makes an economist an economist? TCorp chief economist Brian Redican reflects on over three decades of navigating Australia's economic cycles. Riddhima Talwani writes.







I am somewhat bemused by the statement that ....'ATO data shows that only SMSFs with more than $1 million outperformed the segment.....& etc....'. I couldn't imagine the data produced by the ATO would have anything with respect to timing in receipts of income , contributions, investments etc. and their relative deployments. The broad statement, to my mind is quite misleading.
Outperformed what.... Does the tax office provide info on fund makeup, investor profile etc?