FASEA issues adviser exam proposalsBY JAMIE WILLIAMSON | WEDNESDAY, 11 JUL 2018 4:39PM![]() The Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority released its draft guidance on the five key areas existing financial advisers will be tested on under the new education requirements. Related News |
Editor's Choice
AustralianSuper ups admin fees
|The $430 billion superannuation fund is increasing its administration fees for the first time since 2022.
Advice complaints see biggest increase in FY26: AFCA
|Despite only accounting for less than 10% of the total complaints lodged, investment and advice complaints have seen the steepest increase in FY26, data from AFCA shows.
BUSSQ ups insurance cover, costs
|BUSSQ members will see the cost of their death and TPD cover increase as the fund increases the level of default cover.
Apostle names new head of distribution
|Apostle Funds Management has named a new head of distribution shortly after securing its chief executive.
Further Reading
Products
Featured Profile

Hugh Killen
MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY LIMITED
AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY LIMITED
For Hugh Killen, several life lessons came from spending time on pastoral properties stretching across northern New South Wales and South-West Queensland.








4 hours? I hope they allow for toilet breaks. Sounds more like a marathon than an exam.
What 'exam' is FASEA proposing for pure RISK advisers? I've seen no mention of this. We have the story here about an exam for financial planners but nothing about what will be expected of RISK-only advisers which are a fully different discipline to investment advisers. Why never any mention in these stories FS about this? I hope FASEA or whomever writing the rules comes up with something for risk advisers - surely you don't test a risk adviser on the same material as an investment adviser?! If so we will get real-estate people to do this new FASEA exam for investment advisers will we? A separate qualification for risk advisers is being IGNORED blatently by media, FASEA, FPA, Life companies et al. One question: WHY? This is laziness or is it purposeful? Please explain Pauline?!