Broaden ASIC banning powers: ReportBY KARREN VERGARA | THURSDAY, 7 SEP 2017 12:38PMThe corporate regulator could soon have increased power to ban "unfit" senior managers, directors and officers of financial services companies. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Colchester launches first two ETFs in Australia
|Colchester Global Investors has handed a mandate to Equity Trustees for two new ETFs, making it's first offerings in Australia.
Local advice sector an attractive opportunity for global PE firms
|Local experts are observing a growing investment opportunity in Australian advice platforms that may not be as apparent for global investors, but since the sector is currently at its "infancy", many can capitalise on buying low and selling high.
FSC calls for tougher oversight of advice licensees
|The Financial Services Council (FSC) has called for a significant overhaul of ASIC's supervisions of financial advice licensees, arguing stronger regulatory oversight is needed to better protect consumers following recent industry failures.
State Street launches first active ETFs in Australia
|State Street Investment Management has launched two actively managed exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in an extension of its partnership with Blackstone Credit and Insurance.
Further Reading
Products
Featured Profile

Hugh Killen
MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY LIMITED
AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY LIMITED
For Hugh Killen, several life lessons came from spending time on pastoral properties stretching across northern New South Wales and South-West Queensland.







ASIC definitely requires more authority and effectiveness, but this will only come when they also have more funding. Currently they are very understaffed due to underfunding and the lack of effectiveness contributes to the underfunding. For example there are many, many companies who should have AFSL Licenses but don't. Subsequently the govt. does not receive the license fees and THE CONSUMER DOES NOT GET THE PROTECTION THEY DESERVE. With the current new RG 126, the licensees for the very first time in Australia must abide by a minimum value of Professional Indemnity insurance cover required. With funding hopefully there would be some new systematic policing of licenses and consumer protection by way of adequate PI insurance cover.
This is even more critical with several hundred new companies wanting to participate in the Australian market. It should also be ringing alarm bells that many of the current mark participants who don't have the required license are currently listed on the ASX-how?
How are their shareholders protected?