Majority of SMSF establishments based on bad advice: ASICBY KARREN VERGARA | THURSDAY, 6 NOV 2025 12:37PMNearly two thirds of SMSFs established under the recommendations of a financial adviser are unsuitable to their needs and put retirement savings at risk, an ASIC review reveals. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Antares winds up Ex-20 Aussie equities fund
The Antares Capital Partners' Ex-20 Australian Equities Fund has been terminated after a seven-year run.
J.P. Morgan launches active Aussie equity ETF
The asset manager has listed the J.P. Morgan Australia Equity Active ETF (ASX: JPOZ) on the ASX, targeting to provide long-term return from local companies.
First Sentier expands Northern Trust mandate
Northern Trust has once again expanded its service offering with First Sentier Group, this time for its First Sentier Investors Global Growth Funds.
Bell Financial Group profit surges 133%
Bell Financial Group has reported a 133.3% increase in first half net profit after tax (NPAT) to $21.7 million, supported by stronger market conditions and increased trading activity.
Further Reading
Products
Featured Profile

Andrew Gregory
CHIEF ADVICE OFFICER
UNISUPER
UNISUPER
After 25 years, Andrew Gregory remains motivated by the impact financial advice can have on Australians' lives. As UniSuper's chief advice officer, he is not slowing down on any of his current ambitions. Matthew Wai writes.







Hallelujah!
I continuously see people with a Self Managed Super Fund that is totally unsuitable for them. Most notably they have been put in property developments that are not worth what they paid for them years later. PLUS they are often classed as a wholesale investor when they don't know their elbow from their armpit. Critically, going into Retirement with an SMSF ignores the tendency for diminished capacity.
"also lose important protections, including the benefits of prudential regulation and the ability to make a complaint about the fund or its trustees to AFCA" - worrisome.