Losing triple A by trying to maintain AAABY BENJAMIN ONG | MONDAY, 6 MAY 2013 9:25AMI may be crucified for saying this but it might be time for the Australian government to go counter-cyclical and lift spending and watch the deficit rise. |
Editor's Choice
Colchester launches first two ETFs in Australia
|Colchester Global Investors has handed a mandate to Equity Trustees for two new ETFs, making it's first offerings in Australia.
Local advice sector an attractive opportunity for global PE firms
|Local experts are observing a growing investment opportunity in Australian advice platforms that may not be as apparent for global investors, but since the sector is currently at its "infancy", many can capitalise on buying low and selling high.
FSC calls for tougher oversight of advice licensees
|The Financial Services Council (FSC) has called for a significant overhaul of ASIC's supervisions of financial advice licensees, arguing stronger regulatory oversight is needed to better protect consumers following recent industry failures.
State Street launches first active ETFs in Australia
|State Street Investment Management has launched two actively managed exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in an extension of its partnership with Blackstone Credit and Insurance.
Videos
Brought to you by ![]()
Further Reading
Products
Expert Feed
When geopolitics becomes a portfolio risk
Geopolitics is back - again - and Australian investors can no longer treat it as distant background noise.
Does association membership still matter?
With all the changes the advice sector has experienced in recent years, such as regulatory reform and increased education and professional standards ...
Digital assets and where they stand in 2026
So far in 2026 digital assets have captured the headlines largely for the wrong reasons, but that doesn't tell the full story.
Rethinking default design in a changing market environment
The evolution underway in the US DC system highlights the value of periodically reassessing default design assumptions.
Featured Profile
Hugh Killen
MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY LIMITED
AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY LIMITED
For Hugh Killen, several life lessons came from spending time on pastoral properties stretching across northern New South Wales and South-West Queensland.
The Financial Standard podcast Tune in each week as we discuss the latest developments in Australia's wealth management industry. |  |
Benjamin you cannot be serious. Really. The manner this govt has racked up spending has created a situation where there is no pay back. Just debt. Bad debt. Not good debt where there is return on the invested borrowed funds. This is why we are being slugged another .50% on the medicare levy to fund a good cause- the NDIS. I am glad you mentioned the pink batts but seriously lets figure out how we are going to deal with the current debt problem before we start adding to it. Once again the salaried worker is going to where the increased levy and further inposts down the track and the black economy (ieg cash only at the fish market for take away) gets away with it. I am sure I see a liitle of Greece/Spain/Italy etc in all this.
Peter,
Like I wrote, I may be crucified for saying that but...if you call Australia's deficit/debt -- roughly around 1% and 20% of GDP, respectively -- a problem, then I don't know what the other "luckier" economies have:
Forget Greece's deficit that's around 6.3% of GDP or its debt worth about 157% of its national output. Or Spain which has 6.5% (deficit) and 84.2% (debt) of GDP. Or Italy with 3.1% and 127%, respectively. Or Portugal with 6.1% and 123.6%.
Just compare Australia's fiscal ratios to those of the two non-AAA rated countries which investors are currently pouring their money into:
The United States has a budget deficit of about 5.4% of national output and debt of more than 100% of GDP.
Japan's deficit is 8.9% of GDP (and will certainly grow by more with its planned fiscal stimulus) and debt of 212% of GDP.
Ben I agree with you on this. If you were to look at gov't policy's with the benefit of hindsight they are ass around. During the mining boom and when the economy was going along swimmingly the gov't of the time increased benefits to 'middle' Australians, first home buyer grants, tax cuts, baby bonus etc etc. Then when the economy hits the skids the gov't of the time talk about increasing taxes and decreasing spending. Makes no sense.
My sentiment exactly Stuart