Editor's Choice
Cbus rolls out death benefit nomination changes
Cbus will roll out changes to death benefit nominations, which include scrapping nominations that expire in three years.
Guardians farewells head of asset allocation
The Guardians of NZ Super has named a new head of asset allocation to replace Charles Hyde, who is leaving to take up a role abroad.
IFS recovers record $250m in unpaid super
Industry Fund Services (IFS) has recovered a record $250 million in unpaid superannuation in the 2025-26 financial year, bringing its total recoveries to $2.5 billion since the service commenced.
Betashares launches diversified ETF suite
Betashares has expanded its core investment range with the launch of four diversified exchange traded funds.
Videos
Brought to you by ![]()
Further Reading
Products
Expert Feed
When geopolitics becomes a portfolio risk
Geopolitics is back - again - and Australian investors can no longer treat it as distant background noise.
Does association membership still matter?
With all the changes the advice sector has experienced in recent years, such as regulatory reform and increased education and professional standards ...
Digital assets and where they stand in 2026
So far in 2026 digital assets have captured the headlines largely for the wrong reasons, but that doesn't tell the full story.
Rethinking default design in a changing market environment
The evolution underway in the US DC system highlights the value of periodically reassessing default design assumptions.
Featured Profile
Andrew Gregory
CHIEF ADVICE OFFICER
UNISUPER
UNISUPER
After 25 years, Andrew Gregory remains motivated by the impact financial advice can have on Australians' lives. As UniSuper's chief advice officer, he is not slowing down on any of his current ambitions. Matthew Wai writes.
The Financial Standard podcast Tune in each week as we discuss the latest developments in Australia's wealth management industry. |  |
How ridiculous. Industry funding the government regulator for the industry. Am I missing something here? The big banks are saying that ASIC needs more resources to police the industry and that industry should fund ASIC. So then the banks raise their fees to cover their contribution to ASIC? Simply unbelievable and naive comment.
The big banks hire financial planners whose main job is sell bank products regardless of the inherent risk to anybody that walks through the branch office doors. Surely the question is, when do the big banks take responsibility for their own actions and actions of their staff, admit their collective mea culpa, change their employment practices and disincentivise /prevent their staff from selling high risk products to unsuspecting customers?
As for ASIC, the question has to be is why ASIC has not suspended or revoked the banks financial planning AFSL. There is ample evidence to take to the courts should the banks appeal the revocation of the AFSL. If it was Mr Fred Nobody, a financial planner in the burbs the AFSL would have revoked in nanoseconds.
So....... implement the recommendations of the Trowbridge report, and of the upfront commissions that insurance companies pay, advisers get $1,200 with the remainder going to ASIC?