Getting SMSFs into infra not worth the effortBY LAURA MILLAN | TUESDAY, 24 MAR 2015 12:40PMConvincing self-managed super funds (SMSFs) to invest in infrastructure is not worth the effort and the industry should be focusing on getting good projects out in the market, according to Infrastructure Partnerships Australia chief executive Brendan Lyon. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Netwealth factors First Guardian collapse into executive pay
|Netwealth's board considered the First Guardian Master Fund collapse when determining executive variable remuneration for FY26, as shareholders overwhelmingly supported the company's remuneration report at its annual general meeting (AGM).
Longer lives challenge Australia's retirement model
|Australians could spend close to four decades in retirement, raising questions about how well the nations retirement system accommodates longer lives and increasingly unpredictable exits from the workforce.
Macquarie lands new investment chief for wealth division
|Macquarie Group has named the chief investment officer for its wealth management business, following the departure of the former incumbent.
ASIC forms markets expert advisory group
|ASIC has formed a time-limited markets expert advisory group to provide the regulator with advice, market expertise and international perspectives.
Further Reading
Products
Expert Feed
Featured Profile

Jacqueline Fernley
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
Jacqueline Fernley is a self-confessed nerd, a market animal and as of this year, her own boss. Riddhima Talwani writes.







There will always be some restrictions on an SMSF's ability to invest in infrastructure projects with very long lock-up periods that are perhaps absent in larger pooled superannuation funds. However on the whole if the investment fundamentals stack up then there should be no reason why SMSF's have to be specifically targeted. Build it and they will come of their own volition.
Agree with Nathan''s comment.
Have a look at the Industry Fund Portfolio Service infrastructure investment model. That can accommodate such investors in this space. If such assets can be effectively pooled there is no reason why they shouldn't be invested in infrastructure provided that the long lock up period and lack of liquidity is fully understood by the investors.