Most consumers distrust advisersBY MARK SMITH | TUESDAY, 13 NOV 2012 12:05PMLess than half of Australians believe their advisers are acting in their best interest when offering products and services, according to a global investor study by the State Street Centre for Applied Research. |
Editor's Choice
ASIC sues First Guardian-linked auditors
|ASIC has commenced proceedings against Auditeo Australia and two auditors for their involvement in the First Guardian Master Fund failure.
Acclime acquires Melbourne's Polar 993
|Acclime, a provider of corporate, governance, advisory and fund services across Asia Pacific and global markets, has signed an agreement to acquire the independent trustee and fund administration business from Melbourne.
Platforms are not solution providers: AZ NGA
|AZ NGA group chief executive Paul Barrett warned platforms should stay in their lane rather than overstep to improve financial adviser productivity, reiterating that it is the advice business' responsibility to do so.
Nesta pulls $247m mandate from Northern Trust over climate stance
|UK research and innovation foundation Nesta Trust has transferred £120 million ($247m) of assets from Northern Trust Asset Management to Amundi after the US manager withdrew from major global climate initiatives, highlighting the growing commercial consequences of fund managers stepping back from climate ...
Further Reading
Products
Featured Profile

Hugh Killen
MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY LIMITED
AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY LIMITED
For Hugh Killen, several life lessons came from spending time on pastoral properties stretching across northern New South Wales and South-West Queensland.







These people should just crawl back under their rocks, instead of encouraging "Adviser bashing" to become a national sport.
I mean after you have various scandals and losses at industry funds never hitting the main stream media and being buried on page 52 of the financial papers. Like the losses at one industry fund in particular, union officials being sued for sitting fees received from industry funds, shadow shopping surveys, which showed industry fund advisers were poorly ranked by consumers against both bank and non-aligned planners.
The politicians, regulators, crooked media, rabid consumer groups and the unions have a lot to answer for. It would be interesting to find out how much the media get out of the industry fund cake. I mean how much would it cost to have a 24/7 365 day a year, prime time TV ad campaign run on all the major networks?
We in the profession who try to do the right thing by our clients know the truth and we shouldn't let all this negativity get to us. The silent majority of good advisers will just keep serving their clients as they always have. Be it a fee for service environment, fiduciary duty, FOFA environment or whatever else the bureaucrats and lefty politicos can dream up.
Additionally, financial advisers are unique in this situation. It is difficult to make make any comparison to another profession, as Brad Fox suggests, until the product is removed from the process.
I propose a question; should financial services product creators be given the right to offer clients "Advice" or is this office of "Advice" really just sales hidden behind "Advice"?
I agree most financial advisers are good planners with many benefits and skills that clients can access to improve their financial security and tax outcome. In my opinion ASIC has created this problem for the customer by allowing the financial services product creators to give "advice" on their own product. What is advice and what is sales this is what the client is having trouble with.
True advice or pure advice is what we as advisers should be pushing for, not the creation of conflicted advice by working under an AFSL that is selling a wrap or insurance product created by a related company(or even worse white label someone else's product as their own).
If we look at this entire financial planning process and result from the clients perspective you can see why surveys are getting these results and the lack of trust.
As soon as the regulator defines the difference between "direct sales" and the higher level of Financial Planning "advice" their will always be this lack of trust.
As the director of an independently owned AFSL we aim to provide the Australian market with pure advice not product sales, after all this is what FoFA is all about, I just think that all this could be sorted out much better if the client could see the difference between product sales and true client benefit based advice.