Majority of SMSF establishments based on bad advice: ASICBY KARREN VERGARA | THURSDAY, 6 NOV 2025 12:37PMNearly two thirds of SMSFs established under the recommendations of a financial adviser are unsuitable to their needs and put retirement savings at risk, an ASIC review reveals. Related News |
Editor's Choice
ASIC cancels AFSL of Australian Fiduciaries
|ASIC has cancelled the Australian financial services licence (AFSL) of Queensland-based Australian Fiduciaries, which is currently in liquidation.
Treasury expects regulators to do the heavy lifting
|Treasury has released new Statements of Expectations for APRA and ASIC, with an emphasis on how the regulators should promote a more sustainable and secured financial ecosystem.
NGS Super names head of strategy
|NGS Super has appointed the former ASFA chair as head of strategy, as the fund aims to strengthen its retirement offering.
SS&C axes jobs, shifts roles offshore
|US software services giant SS&C Technologies has slashed 170 Australian roles in the operations, technology and delivery teams.
Products
Featured Profile

Blake Briggs
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
FINANCIAL SERVICES COUNCIL
FINANCIAL SERVICES COUNCIL
Since becoming chief executive, Blake Briggs has renewed the Financial Services Council's influence, expanded the membership base, and strengthened its policy and advocacy credentials. Karren Vergara writes.







Hallelujah!
I continuously see people with a Self Managed Super Fund that is totally unsuitable for them. Most notably they have been put in property developments that are not worth what they paid for them years later. PLUS they are often classed as a wholesale investor when they don't know their elbow from their armpit. Critically, going into Retirement with an SMSF ignores the tendency for diminished capacity.
"also lose important protections, including the benefits of prudential regulation and the ability to make a complaint about the fund or its trustees to AFCA" - worrisome.