FPA proposes risk commission capBY DARREN SNYDER | TUESDAY, 5 MAY 2015 11:20AMAustralia's main financial planning associations have revealed their views on the risk advice remuneration models that the industry should adopt following the release of the Trowbridge report. Related News |
Editor's Choice
RBA on hold but keeps door open for more hikes
The Reserve Bank of Australia has kept the door open for further tightening despite keeping the cash rate steady at 4.35%.
DASH appoints new chief executive
DASH Technology Group appointed a new chief executive, replacing the incumbent who left the company in May.
GQG sees $6.4bn outflows in July
GQG Partners recorded another significant month of client redemptions in July, with net outflows of US$4.5 billion ($6.4b), as the global fund manager continued to face pressure on funds under management.
A tough year for high-duration bond investors: Morningstar
New analysis depicted duration as the biggest headwind for bond investors, with both Australian and global bonds labelled as the "laggards" against their peers over the 12 months to June end.
Further Reading
Products
Featured Profile

Andrew Gregory
CHIEF ADVICE OFFICER
UNISUPER
UNISUPER
After 25 years, Andrew Gregory remains motivated by the impact financial advice can have on Australians' lives. As UniSuper's chief advice officer, he is not slowing down on any of his current ambitions. Matthew Wai writes.







If I read this correctly the FPA is saying ongoing commissions (renewals) are not important compared to initial. Please tell me if I'm wrong. If I'm correct in my understanding they have their head in the clouds and no experience as risk advisers looking after clients on a daily basis. This is at least as time consuming as initiation of a policy in many cases. FPA appears to have no clue about risk and what is involved. This fluff they come out with is counterproductive. Appreciate them trying to help but rather they stay out of the way and let the adults involved in proper risk advice get on with it.