Coalition signals super policy changesBY ALEX DUNNIN | FRIDAY, 12 JUL 2013 10:10AMThe coalition has signalled that if it wins the 2013 federal election it will institute major reforms regarding how super funds appoint trustees while expecting funds to speed up how they pass on scale fee benefits. |
Editor's Choice
The 'blind spot' costing advisers nearly $10bn: Research
Research from Elemnta indicates financial advisers do not realise they are expending nearly twice as much effort on non-advised operations, highlighting a perception gap and challenges related to data collection and access, which cost 6000 practices about $9.36 billion in "destroyed enterprise value".
Canadian pension giant takes 20% stake in La Trobe
Canadian public pension fund OMERS has taken a minority stake of nearly 20% in La Trobe Financial from Brookfield.
ASIC issues another stop order for private credit fund
ASIC has issued an interim stop order on the Murdoch Clarke Mortgage Fund, issued by Murdoch Clarke Mortgage Management, prohibiting it from offering, issuing, selling or transferring interests in the fund.
Inheritors struggle to act on financial advice: Survey
Australia's wealthy inheritors are making major financial decisions before they feel ready, with new research highlighting a gap between receiving professional advice and having the confidence to act on it.
Further Reading
Products
Expert Feed
Featured Profile

David Sharpe
CHAIRMAN
FINANCIAL ADVICE ASSOCIATION AUSTRALIA
FINANCIAL ADVICE ASSOCIATION AUSTRALIA
A family man, business owner, cricket fanatic and financial adviser, David Sharpe has many facets. One of his biggest legacies, as he steps down as chair of the Financial Advice Association Australia, is leaving the profession stronger than he found it.







The statements made by the Member for Bradfield are offensive and show yet again how out of touch he and his ilk are. I was a Director/Trustee for a period of twenty plus years along with five others (including three Company Directors) on a voluntary basis. The only reason we gave it away was due to the increased regulation and protections caused by the actions of the professionals and now it is stated that there is no competition because of the compulsory schemes. What the Member would be better at is cleaning up the disasters caused by the paid professionals but levied against the entitlements of the members of funds.
Of course that will happen the same time as a polly will never get more than the average worker receives in annual salary increases or allowances. Rather than trying to get the snouts into the trough by so called independents being appointed a bigger effort in making sure that the exact same transparency applies to retail and corporates alike is required.
I know it maybe hard for you to actually be consistent in the approach but it would be a nice approach if it was honestly attempted by the coalition instead of the continued attack on people doing a job and meeting the requirements laid down by the legislation.