Bring in Chilean-style super tender process: Grattan InstituteBY JAMES FERNYHOUGH | MONDAY, 28 APR 2014 12:40PMThe government should get involved in picking default superannuation funds in order to increase competition and bring down fees, a Grattan Institute report has argued. Related News |
Editor's Choice
ASX launches first Australian bond and credit index futures
ASX has launched Australia's first exchange traded bond and credit index futures, giving institutional investors a new way to manage exposure to the domestic fixed income market.
Second bidder emerges for Equity Trustees
Following TPG Global's initial bid for Equity Trustees' holding company last week, a local investor has joined with an improved offer.
HESTA reduces fees, minimum balance for income stream
HESTA will reduce administration fees and lower the minimum balance required to start an income stream account from September 30.
AMP North appoints head of strategic growth
AMP North has appointed Emma Kirk as head of strategic growth, marking her return to the financial services giant after two decades.
Further Reading
Products
Featured Profile

Andrew Gregory
CHIEF ADVICE OFFICER
UNISUPER
UNISUPER
After 25 years, Andrew Gregory remains motivated by the impact financial advice can have on Australians' lives. As UniSuper's chief advice officer, he is not slowing down on any of his current ambitions. Matthew Wai writes.







What a strange place for the Grattan Institute to source a superannuation fee model. Was that the land of the Juntas until recently? Apples with apples should be compared. It should not always be about fees. Industry super always talk up its low fee structure not considering some vanilla retail funds which also have low fee structures.
Many industry superannuation funds do not have anti detriment inclusions Fees created within our superannuation can include necessary commonwealth government compliance.
Keep up the think tanking Grattan Institute.