Asteron ends business relations with 134 rogue advisersBY LAURA MILLAN | FRIDAY, 31 OCT 2014 12:20PMAsteron Life has stopped distributing its products among 134 rogue advisers last year, executive general manager Jordan Hawke confirmed. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Australia, UK partner to procure well-regulated financial markets
Following its inaugural meeting in September 2025, the second UK-Australia Joint Financial Regulatory Forum took place this week, with Australia remaining vocal about placing greater emphasis on governance and asset valuation of private markets.
Count takes 30% stake in Brisbane advice firm
Count has agreed to acquire a 30% stake in Brisbane-based accounting and financial advice firm Apiary Financial, continuing its push to expand its equity partnership network while reporting stronger first-quarter earnings.
Audit quality continues to fall short: ASIC
The corporate regulator has called for improvements in audit quality and financial reporting after its latest surveillance found companies, including superannuation funds, are still not getting the fundamentals right.
ETFs entering 3.0 era: JPMAM
JPMAM believes thematic ETFs may become a thing of the past as actively managed ETFs become more prevalent.
Further Reading
Products
Expert Feed
Featured Profile

Jacqueline Fernley
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
Jacqueline Fernley is a self-confessed nerd, a market animal and as of this year, her own boss. Riddhima Talwani writes.







Well done Asteron for having the courage to take this action against these rogue advisers, too bad the CBA does not do the same. And where is ASIC on this, if Asteron can identify the rogue advisers why can't ASIC?
Well done Jordy but let me be cynical . Were these advisers who churned business out of Asteron or churned business into Asteron? My experience says they are rogues when they rip business away from you and stars when they churn it into you life company. How is the industry dealing with this conundrum?
Is it fair to only level the term "rogue" towards some advisers in this conversation identified by an insurer?
It can also apply to the rogue behaviour of some insurers, some dealers and even some of the regulators.