ASIC takes action against RestBY JAMIE WILLIAMSON | TUESDAY, 2 MAR 2021 5:13PMThe corporate regulator has commenced civil proceedings against the industry superannuation fund for misleading members in relation to voluntary rollovers. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Blackwattle takes over Quest Asset Partners
Blackwattle Investment Partners has swallowed up Australian equities manager Quest Asset Partners for an undisclosed sum.
Funds SA poaches Vision Super risk specialist
Funds SA will welcome a Vision Super executive to replace executive director, governance and strategy Tony Burrill, as he prepares for retirement following a seven-year tenure at the company.
Regal flags muted second-half performance fees
Regal Partners expects to recognise at least $122.7 million in fund performance fee revenue for calendar 2026, with market volatility and weaker investment performance limiting the prospect of further material fees in the second half.
Insignia chief draws 'hard line' on NCAs giving retirement advice
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley said he draws a hard line when it come to the new class of advisers (NCAs) giving retirement advice.
Further Reading
Products
Expert Feed
Featured Profile

Fiona Macgregor
GROUP CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND MANAGING DIRECTOR
TAL LIMITED
TAL LIMITED
Fiona Macgregor has risen through the ranks at TAL, taking the top job in 2024, but her life was touched by the insurance sector long before her tenure with the life insurer began. Eliza Bavin writes.







So what is ASIC going to do? Impose a fine?
Then, who'll pay! (Not a question.)
there are other industry funds that have done the same thing
ASIC is acting in no ones interests by pursuing this case.
The government, together with its advisers (including the regulators) have created a massive conundrum for super funds with the separate processes for portability and choice of fund. Having a member empty (and close) their account only to have further contributions arrive the following week or month is administratively costly for funds that have to deal with this.
Legislation allowing members to make a full portability transfer without a corresponding choice of fund election has created this problem. To prosecute a fund for trying to manage this efficiently in the interests of all members is not justice.
Where is the mechanism for the super fund to reject these contributions to the ATO, where the member can then have them passed to their new fund?