Advisers call for exam, standards clarityBY KARREN VERGARA | WEDNESDAY, 29 NOV 2017 12:18PMAdvisers are calling for much needed clarity around the new education standards, the code of ethics and what the formidable exam entails.
Related News |
Editor's Choice
Platinum announces strategic review
Platinum said following the review Platinum Capital and Platinum Asia Investments may be wound up.
Sequoia chief's job at stake in upcoming EGM
Sequoia Financial Group will hold an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) in June that will consider a resolution to remove chief executive and managing director Garry Crole.
Scott Farquhar steps down from Atlassian
After more than two decades at the helm, Scott Farquhar will step down as co-chief executive of Atlassian.
Goldman Sachs ditches robo-adviser Marcus Invest
The investment bank is offloading Marcus Invest to Betterment just three years after announcing it will launch the digital adviser.
Further Reading
Sponsored by | Where do advisers invest their time?The stage 3 tax cuts have sparked discussions on bracket creep. Implementing a tax-effective investment strategy is crucial now more than ever. |
Sponsored by | Quality and Yield. A Powerful combination.With central bank rates seemingly peaked, investors are not awaiting yield increases. We're bucking the trend with investment rates at decadal highs |
Sponsored by | Why it could be a good time to be a growth contrarianGrowth-style companies are in vogue, but you may need to think outside the box to ensure you don't overpay. |
Products
Featured Profile
Fiona Mann
HEAD OF LISTED EQUITIES AND ESG
BRIGHTER SUPER
BRIGHTER SUPER
Brighter Super head of listed equities and ESG Fiona Mann was shaped by a childhood steeped in military-like discipline and global nomadism. Andrew McKean writes.
I think it's called, reinventing the wheel again again!
So we continue to become a country of over regulation and checking with no positive outcome.
These ill conceived government changes in respect to risk advisers had 3 major objectives as I understand it:
- they were meant to stop churning and reduce premiums (by slashing adviser upfront remuneration).
- but premiums continue to rise and this will not stop "churning " assuming churning exists to the levels they portray and I dont believe it does and could have easily been fixed if the insurers showed some desire to fix it.
- advisers must be degree qualified - the inference being this will lead to better advice and ethics - hasnt worked for accountants and lawyers has it.
- better advice to clients - despite the continued intrusion of compliance processes and the cost of "checking" clients are now in a worse position than ever - advice statements have become so de-personalised and paper-heavy that people are simply not reading them and hence the advice outcomes are heavily compromised.
As for adviser education, what a joke this is for risk advisers - any course I have been forced to attend on retaining risk qualifications is top heavy with everything but risk training that would assist in helping a risk adviser achieve better standards.
Stop meddling and let an industry, albeit not a perfect one, get on with its important role in the community or risk advice will end up in the hands of the bank, industry super funds, online insurers and TV providers - what a disaster that has proven to be.