SMSFs retarding growth in Australia: Credit SuisseBY LAURA MILLAN | WEDNESDAY, 29 JAN 2014 12:50PMSelf-managed super funds (SMSFs) "are retarding growth in Australia" by controlling much of the equity that could be used for new investment and demanding dividend increases instead. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Apostle taps former Platinum AM chief
Apostle Funds Management has appointed a new chief executive following the departure of managing director Mitchell Gunman earlier this year.
LRBA ban raises questions as new details emerge
New data indicates the impact of the LRBAs ban for SMSFs may have been underestimated, which will affect a market significantly larger than what officials suggested, with major implications for housing supply and competition in the mortgage market.
IFM acquires shopping centre portfolio for $300m
IFM Investors has acquired a shopping centre portfolio to be developed and built by Australian-owned developer-builder Oreana with a value of approximately $300 million, as it seeks to harness a surge in convenience-based shopping.
VanEck targets tech thematics with trifecta launch
VanEck is bringing three ETFs to life for local investors to access thematic investments across several emerging technology sectors, including what it says is "Australia's first dedicated quantum computing ETF."
Further Reading
Products
Featured Profile

Hugh Killen
MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY LIMITED
AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY LIMITED
For Hugh Killen, several life lessons came from spending time on pastoral properties stretching across northern New South Wales and South-West Queensland.







Isn't this just a reflection of an ageing and increasingly retired population that is more interested in income than growth?
It has actually been companies choosing to pay higher dividends as they view that expansionary measures are too costly at the moment. This is certainly true in the mining sector. Business expansion should only ever be targeted where it can be done at a profit.
The other reason for demanding income return along the way is that the investment market can be so volatile these days that you need investment return along the way, not just when you sell the asset.
Corporate bonds are a product subject to capital value movements whilst coupon returns are subject to RBA benchmarks. Also corporate bonds don't have the trading flexibility that shares do.