SMSF trustees suffer "unacceptably poor advice"BY LAURA MILLAN | WEDNESDAY, 13 NOV 2013 12:05PMSelf-managed super fund (SMSF) trustees are suffering "an unacceptably high level of poor advice" when it comes to set up and administering their funds. Related News |
Editor's Choice
AIA snags Acenda head of products
|AIA Australia has welcomed a new head of partnerships, who joined from Acenda after leaving the firm in March.
Praemium chief exits amid leadership renewal
|Praemium is reshuffling its top leadership to refresh its strategy, keeping the same goals but with "faster pace, better execution and increased focus on customers".
ASIC lifts stop orders against Remara
|ASIC has lifted three interim stop orders against Remara Investment Management's private credit products, after it amended its target market determination (TMD).
Brookfield-owned Oaktree raises US$2bn for private credit fund
|Brookfield-owned Oaktree has achieved its target fund raise of US$2 billion for its Asset-Backed Financial Fund.
Further Reading
Products
Featured Profile

Cliff Man
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ETF SHARES MANAGEMENT LTD
ETF SHARES MANAGEMENT LTD
ETF Shares chief executive Cliff Man spent his career automating, building and challenging established systems. Now, he is betting that Australia's ETF market has room for something different. Vinny Vucago writes.







Of course these organisations will say anything and do anything to try and stop the flow of funds leaving the industry and retail superannuation sector. These guys cannot make a submission without bias and therefore the ASIC should ignore their comments. They should also provide proper reference to the university papers referred as there is more to those papers than has been explained. I think the Rice Warner report commissioned by the ASIC speaks of an SMSF being more cost effective than others at the $200K mark.