Editor's Choice
Iress bets on AI as business transformation moves forward
Iress is shifting its focus from business simplification to executing an ambitious artificial intelligence (AI)-driven product strategy that will help financial advisers slash work processes by nearly 40%.
Macquarie AM-led consortium finalises Qube takeover
Macquarie Asset Management (MAM) and a consortium of global investors, including UniSuper and the family office of a Spanish billionaire, have completed their $11.7 billion acquisition of logistics and infrastructure giant Qube Holdings.
Alexis George takes on board appointment
Former AMP chief executive Alexis George has taken on a new board position, five months after announcing her intention to retire.
CFS launches pension bonus
Colonial First State (CFS) has launched new retirement solutions offering eligible members a one-off payment when moving from accumulation into retirement.
Further Reading
Products
Featured Profile

Andrew Gregory
CHIEF ADVICE OFFICER
UNISUPER
UNISUPER
After 25 years, Andrew Gregory remains motivated by the impact financial advice can have on Australians' lives. As UniSuper's chief advice officer, he is not slowing down on any of his current ambitions. Matthew Wai writes.







What a surprise that SMSF members are satisfied with the vehicle that they chose :)
Calculating performance as $ is not really comparing apples to apples, because you'd expect that SMSF's by their very nature to generally have higher balances than their industry fund and retail counterparts.
Of course a SMSF owner will be happier if their super fund grew by $100k* from $500k to $600k, compared to a retail/industry fund members who's balance grew by $10k (assuming no contributions) from $50k to $60k. After all that's a $90k better 'performance' yet still both returned 20%.
I appreciate that you can not properly compare by % because no SMSF is the same, buts its still wrong to say that SMSF are happier with performance because the measure is wrong/false.