FPA proposes risk commission capBY DARREN SNYDER | TUESDAY, 5 MAY 2015 11:20AMAustralia's main financial planning associations have revealed their views on the risk advice remuneration models that the industry should adopt following the release of the Trowbridge report. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Australian dividend distributions rebound in Q3
|Australia saw a significant rebound in dividend distributions in the quarter to September 30, with the recovery attributable to BHP and the broader mining sector.
Aequitas hires from Vanguard again
|Aequitas Investment Partners has named a head of asset consulting, joining from Vanguard Australia.
RBA delivers another hike in split decision
|The Reserve Bank of Australia delivered its fifth interest rate hike this year, but the monetary board was split in its decision.
Sequoia profits tank as advisers flee
|Sequoia's Q1 revenue dropped close to 60% while also recording a profit loss. Despite this former chief executive Garry Crole took home more than $400k.
Further Reading
Products
Expert Feed
Featured Profile

Jacqueline Fernley
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
Jacqueline Fernley is a self-confessed nerd, a market animal and as of this year, her own boss. Riddhima Talwani writes.







If I read this correctly the FPA is saying ongoing commissions (renewals) are not important compared to initial. Please tell me if I'm wrong. If I'm correct in my understanding they have their head in the clouds and no experience as risk advisers looking after clients on a daily basis. This is at least as time consuming as initiation of a policy in many cases. FPA appears to have no clue about risk and what is involved. This fluff they come out with is counterproductive. Appreciate them trying to help but rather they stay out of the way and let the adults involved in proper risk advice get on with it.