Don't ignore Lifecycle Funds: MercerBY BEN COLLINS | TUESDAY, 13 NOV 2012 11:50AMThe benefits of Lifecycle Funds are not understood in the superannuation sector, and they should be considered as a default option under MySuper, said Mercer. |
Editor's Choice
ASIC pushes to bolster competitiveness
|The regulator has hosted a roundtable with financial services leaders to encourage competitiveness, as it fears Australia is falling behind its global peers.
Euroz Hartleys sells capital markets arm to Canada's BMO
|Euroz Hartleys has sold its capital markets business to Canada's BMO Financial Group (BMO) for $145 million in an all-cash deal.
ETF adoption hits 'meaningful threshold' among SWFs
|Nearly 40% of sovereign wealth funds have an allocation to ETFs, a new report from Invesco shows, underscoring their expanded roles among institutional investors as their rate of adoption hits a "meaningful threshold".
Super system to hit $12.4tn by 2045
|Australia's superannuation system is forecast to triple in size over the next two decades reaching $12.4 trillion by 2045, as sustainable retirement outcomes become the sector's defining challenge.
Products
Expert Feed
When geopolitics becomes a portfolio risk
Geopolitics is back - again - and Australian investors can no longer treat it as distant background noise.
Does association membership still matter?
With all the changes the advice sector has experienced in recent years, such as regulatory reform and increased education and professional standards ...
Digital assets and where they stand in 2026
So far in 2026 digital assets have captured the headlines largely for the wrong reasons, but that doesn't tell the full story.
Rethinking default design in a changing market environment
The evolution underway in the US DC system highlights the value of periodically reassessing default design assumptions.
Featured Profile
Judith Fiander
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AUSTRALIAN PHILANTHROPIC SERVICES
AUSTRALIAN PHILANTHROPIC SERVICES
When Judith Fiander first walked in the doors of Australian Philanthropic Services her intention was to volunteer for a few months. Fast forward 14 years and she is the chief executive. Eliza Bavin writes.
The "proven history" around the world should include the experience in the U.S. in 2008. The most conservative TDFs - those for individuals with an imminent retirement - lost between 9% and 41%. A Joint Congressional Hearing was held by the DOL and SEC to canvass the reasons for this failure in risk management. It turns out "nothing goes up in a falling market except for correlation". Diversification doesn't insulate against losses. Any adoption of TDFs should consider this, especially if we systematically rotate investors out of equities and into fixed income, at a point where yields are at intergenerational lows.
The thought of being moved into conservative assets just because I have ticked over age 65 seems irrational. With potentially 30 years ahead of me in retirement, where am I getting growth from to support my income needs? Hard to believe no one has 'come up and challenged him'.
Our members experience has been most positive in running an age based lifecycle default for the last 8 years and over a full economic cycle. This includes a loss of only 4% over the GFC for over 65's compared to the median Balanced loss of - 18% which was inflicted on most retirees. Whilst modeling of increased risk later in life may suggest higher investment returns the key is in matching member volatility tolerance with an acceptable level of investment risk. The end result is happy members with good consistent returns over the full economic cycle. Lifecycle investing works!