Broaden ASIC banning powers: ReportBY KARREN VERGARA | THURSDAY, 7 SEP 2017 12:38PMThe corporate regulator could soon have increased power to ban "unfit" senior managers, directors and officers of financial services companies. Related News |
Editor's Choice
HESTA lowers investment fees
|HESTA has dropped investment fees and costs across most of its core investment options.
BT adds to C-suite with new role
|BT has appointed an inaugural chief product officer - digital, hiring from Macquarie.
Janus Henderson completes Rantum Capital acquisition
|Janus Henderson has completed its acquisition of German private markets manager Rantum Capital after receiving the necessary regulatory approvals, expanding its private credit and private equity capabilities across Europe.
Super fund-backed Atmos raises near $3bn
|Atmos Renewables, an Australian subsidiary of Igneo Infrastructure Partners and is co-invested by local super funds like Cbus, MLC and AMP Super, has raised a combined $2.9 billion for two energy projects that account for almost one gigawatt of renewable capacity.
Further Reading
Products
Featured Profile

Cliff Man
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ETF SHARES MANAGEMENT LTD
ETF SHARES MANAGEMENT LTD
ETF Shares chief executive Cliff Man spent his career automating, building and challenging established systems. Now, he is betting that Australia's ETF market has room for something different. Vinny Vucago writes.







ASIC definitely requires more authority and effectiveness, but this will only come when they also have more funding. Currently they are very understaffed due to underfunding and the lack of effectiveness contributes to the underfunding. For example there are many, many companies who should have AFSL Licenses but don't. Subsequently the govt. does not receive the license fees and THE CONSUMER DOES NOT GET THE PROTECTION THEY DESERVE. With the current new RG 126, the licensees for the very first time in Australia must abide by a minimum value of Professional Indemnity insurance cover required. With funding hopefully there would be some new systematic policing of licenses and consumer protection by way of adequate PI insurance cover.
This is even more critical with several hundred new companies wanting to participate in the Australian market. It should also be ringing alarm bells that many of the current mark participants who don't have the required license are currently listed on the ASX-how?
How are their shareholders protected?