Broaden ASIC banning powers: ReportBY KARREN VERGARA | THURSDAY, 7 SEP 2017 12:38PMThe corporate regulator could soon have increased power to ban "unfit" senior managers, directors and officers of financial services companies. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Ellerston to shutter another Morphic fund
Ellerston Capital will close the Morphic Ethical Equities Fund, terminating the last remaining Morphic Asset Management fund under its umbrella.
Channel Capital awarded mandate
Channel Capital has been awarded a mandate to act as responsible entity for an Australian property fund.
Bravura adds to C-suite
Bravura Solutions is continuing its hiring spree, adding a new member to the C-suite after appointing two Asia Pacific directors in September.
RQI Investors launch emerging markets strategy
RQI Investors has launched a new emerging markets strategy backed by seed capital from a major Australian super fund, as the quantitative equities manager expands its offering and investment team.
Further Reading
Products
Expert Feed
When geopolitics becomes a portfolio risk
Geopolitics is back - again - and Australian investors can no longer treat it as distant background noise.
Does association membership still matter?
With all the changes the advice sector has experienced in recent years, such as regulatory reform and increased education and professional standards ...
Digital assets and where they stand in 2026
So far in 2026 digital assets have captured the headlines largely for the wrong reasons, but that doesn't tell the full story.
Rethinking default design in a changing market environment
The evolution underway in the US DC system highlights the value of periodically reassessing default design assumptions.
Featured Profile
Cliff Man
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ETF SHARES MANAGEMENT LTD
ETF SHARES MANAGEMENT LTD
ETF Shares chief executive Cliff Man spent his career automating, building and challenging established systems. Now, he is betting that Australia's ETF market has room for something different. Vinny Vucago writes.
The Financial Standard podcast Tune in each week as we discuss the latest developments in Australia's wealth management industry. |  |
ASIC definitely requires more authority and effectiveness, but this will only come when they also have more funding. Currently they are very understaffed due to underfunding and the lack of effectiveness contributes to the underfunding. For example there are many, many companies who should have AFSL Licenses but don't. Subsequently the govt. does not receive the license fees and THE CONSUMER DOES NOT GET THE PROTECTION THEY DESERVE. With the current new RG 126, the licensees for the very first time in Australia must abide by a minimum value of Professional Indemnity insurance cover required. With funding hopefully there would be some new systematic policing of licenses and consumer protection by way of adequate PI insurance cover.
This is even more critical with several hundred new companies wanting to participate in the Australian market. It should also be ringing alarm bells that many of the current mark participants who don't have the required license are currently listed on the ASX-how?
How are their shareholders protected?