Bring on compulsory annuities, says Deloitte partnerBY JAMES FERNYHOUGH | WEDNESDAY, 28 MAY 2014 12:40PMThe government should introduce compulsory deferred lifetime annuities as a way of insuring against longevity risk, Deloitte's lead superannuation advisory partner Russell Mason has said. Related News |
Editor's Choice
IFM Investors appoints global product strategy head
|IFM Investors has strengthened its global leadership team with a senior appointment of a former WTW consultant.
Macquarie AM launches venture growth fund
|The new fund will provide eligible investors access to late-stage growth companies around the world based on a two-decade track record with more than 350 investments.
Consistent climate disclosures matter: ASFA, ACSI
|The Association of Superannuation Funds Australia (ASFA) and the Australian Council of Superannuation Investors (ACSI have joined four other peak investment bodies to push for continued transparent and comparable climate disclosure.
Ironbark expands advice footprint with acquisition
|Ironbark Financial Group has acquired a Victoria-based multi-disciplinary firm that specialises in assisting small to medium sized businesses, integrating the practice into its Ironbark Advice brand.
Further Reading
Products
Expert Feed
Featured Profile

Jacqueline Fernley
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
Jacqueline Fernley is a self-confessed nerd, a market animal and as of this year, her own boss. Riddhima Talwani writes.







I am afraid of the 'dead hand' of compulsion in this argument about 'longevity risk'.
It flows off the tongue so easily. What could be better? says Mr Mason. This would take the risk out of everything for people when they reach old age.
Mr Mason suggests that George Osborne is just a politician looking to be re-elected. What nonsense!
Governments should never be in this area. It is so short sighted to hitch on to the Government teat. Imagine the bureaucracy that would grow like 'topsy' in order to administer things. Imagine also the fees that 'experts' in this field could graft from the government in the name of 'compliance & etc...'
The economist,Mr Maddock is correct!, 'Why stick your money into something that gives you 3% return, which you might get back when you are 85?'.