Banks should pay advice exit levy: TAABY ANNABELLE DICKSON | THURSDAY, 18 MAR 2021 11:31AMThe Advisers Association (TAA) is calling on the government to mandate major banks and institutions pay an exit levy upon leaving the advice industry to provide relief for financial advisers and mitigate the increasing levy. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Trustees, platforms, cyber risk under APRA spotlight
Superannuation trustees, platforms and cyber resilience will be under more scrutiny in the 2027 financial year from the prudential regulator.
ASIC draws parallels between ASX and super trustee failures
ASIC commissioner Simone Constant has urged superannuation trustees to make good use of member data to better understand their needs as they move towards and through retirement.
Perpetual hit with double whammy redemption, impairment
Perpetual's earnings will be slugged with a massive impairment thanks to an unnamed client redeeming nearly $6.5 billion (US$4.6bn) from a strategy run by Thompson, Siegel & Walmsley LLC (TSW).
GQG hit by $21bn outflows, FUM falls
GQG Partners has recorded US$15.1 billion ($21.2 billion) in net outflows in the first half of 2026, sending funds under management (FUM) down 9.5% despite resilient investment performance across several of its strategies.
Further Reading
Products
Featured Profile

Andrew Gregory
CHIEF ADVICE OFFICER
UNISUPER
UNISUPER
After 25 years, Andrew Gregory remains motivated by the impact financial advice can have on Australians' lives. As UniSuper's chief advice officer, he is not slowing down on any of his current ambitions. Matthew Wai writes.







Frankly, why is it that advisers are changed a levy at all to maintain a government bureaucracy? A policing agency at that! It's incredulous to me that the various adviser associations have meekly sat by and not raised a single voice in protest about this outrage?
It's not unlike a couple of government reps coming into your home demanding all of your valuables and all of your money. You protest and say 'how do you expect to get away with this?' They then say, 'two reasons: a) because we want what you have; and b) because we can!'