AustSuper denies member exploitation of group insuranceBY JAMES FERNYHOUGH | WEDNESDAY, 27 NOV 2013 12:40PMAustralianSuper chief executive Ian Silk has denied that 'automatic acceptance' to the fund's group life insurance offering is being exploited. Related News |
Editor's Choice
ARK Invest awards local distribution mandate
Cathie Wood's ARK Investment Management has chosen Associate Global Partners (AGP) to help distribute its venture capital strategy to Australian wholesale investors.
APRA names new deputy chairs
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has welcomed the appointment of two new deputy chairs, with current board member Therese McCarthy Hockey and former assistant treasurer David Bradbury set to join the regulator's leadership.
MySuper provides consistent returns for members: Rainmaker
New data from Rainmaker Information found MySuper or default options continued to deliver consistent performances and returns for Australians, despite periods of uncertainty.
Australian Unity names new wealth chief
Australian Unity has named the successor of Esther Kerr, who departed the organisation last year.
Products
Featured Profile

Judith Fiander
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AUSTRALIAN PHILANTHROPIC SERVICES
AUSTRALIAN PHILANTHROPIC SERVICES
When Judith Fiander first walked in the doors of Australian Philanthropic Services her intention was to volunteer for a few months. Fast forward 14 years and she is the chief executive. Eliza Bavin writes.







Having previously made contact with Australian Super and TAL in relation to their insurance, neither seemed to have an answer when it comes to pre-existing conditions. On being told to read the PDS, it appears that all pre existing conditions are not covered.
Check out the joint Directorships of Australian Super and TAL when the AAL's were negotiated (just Google up !)
I find it increasingly of interest that people who do not run businesses make some sort of smart comments about how they are being run. In this case Australian Super's CEO Ian Silk has made his case quite clearly that it is not an issue for his trustee's. So whomever has this view had better put up some evidence or go away.
It is the same nonsense that runs around the industry about which company is doing what and experience what in terms of claims. It is all about past underwriting quality and what group business is on the books at what rate. These are all pragmatic business decisions that result in outcomes.
Both TAL and other life companies will make their own decisions without the uniformed views of the Commentariat.