Asteron ends business relations with 134 rogue advisersBY LAURA MILLAN | FRIDAY, 31 OCT 2014 12:20PMAsteron Life has stopped distributing its products among 134 rogue advisers last year, executive general manager Jordan Hawke confirmed. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Metrics freezes redemptions behind listed funds as audit stalls
|Metrics Credit Partners has suspended redemptions in the unlisted wholesale funds that underpin its three ASX-listed strategies, according to an ASX statement by the funds' responsible entity.
APRA flexes fresh powers, zeros in on trustees
|APRA has released a package of proposals to strengthen trustee investment governance saying it has "elevated concerns" about the platform sector.
ASIC sets FY27 priorities straight
|ASIC has outlined its supervisory priorities for 2026-27 with reviews of artificial intelligence (AI), member services and advice fee deductions among the areas of focus for financial services firms.
UBS brings home new alternatives leader
|UBS is relocating a private markets specialist from Switzerland to lead its unified global alternatives (UGA) business in Australia, effective 1 November 2026.
Further Reading
Products
Featured Profile

Rachel Alembakis
STEWARDSHIP MANAGER
UNITING ETHICAL INVESTORS LIMITED
UNITING ETHICAL INVESTORS LIMITED
As a highly respected journalist, Rachel Alembakis helped push sustainable investing on the agenda long before it was mainstream. Now, she's stepped into the arena to shape the industry from within. Karren Vergara writes.







Well done Asteron for having the courage to take this action against these rogue advisers, too bad the CBA does not do the same. And where is ASIC on this, if Asteron can identify the rogue advisers why can't ASIC?
Well done Jordy but let me be cynical . Were these advisers who churned business out of Asteron or churned business into Asteron? My experience says they are rogues when they rip business away from you and stars when they churn it into you life company. How is the industry dealing with this conundrum?
Is it fair to only level the term "rogue" towards some advisers in this conversation identified by an insurer?
It can also apply to the rogue behaviour of some insurers, some dealers and even some of the regulators.