Asteron ends business relations with 134 rogue advisersBY LAURA MILLAN | FRIDAY, 31 OCT 2014 12:20PMAsteron Life has stopped distributing its products among 134 rogue advisers last year, executive general manager Jordan Hawke confirmed. Related News |
Editor's Choice
CFS launches retirement income optimiser
Colonial First State (CFS) has launched a new retirement feature designed to give eligible super members greater flexibility in preparing for retirement and accessing future income options.
Perpetual names insto relationship, funds services lead
Perpetual Corporate Trust, the corporate trustee, custody and digital infrastructure services arm of Perpetual, has welcomed an executive to oversee its institutional relationships and managed funds services.
Woodbridge loans $100m for Brisbane residential development
Woodbridge Capital has provided a new $100 million loan for a residential development in Brisbane, delivering 150 apartments close to the CBD.
Chalmers applauds $22bn Budget deficit
In the government's Final Budget Outcome, Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the $22.6 billion deficit is still $6 billion better than forecasts.
Further Reading
Products
Featured Profile

Rachel Alembakis
STEWARDSHIP MANAGER
UNITING ETHICAL INVESTORS LIMITED
UNITING ETHICAL INVESTORS LIMITED
As a highly respected journalist, Rachel Alembakis helped push sustainable investing on the agenda long before it was mainstream. Now, she's stepped into the arena to shape the industry from within. Karren Vergara writes.







Well done Asteron for having the courage to take this action against these rogue advisers, too bad the CBA does not do the same. And where is ASIC on this, if Asteron can identify the rogue advisers why can't ASIC?
Well done Jordy but let me be cynical . Were these advisers who churned business out of Asteron or churned business into Asteron? My experience says they are rogues when they rip business away from you and stars when they churn it into you life company. How is the industry dealing with this conundrum?
Is it fair to only level the term "rogue" towards some advisers in this conversation identified by an insurer?
It can also apply to the rogue behaviour of some insurers, some dealers and even some of the regulators.