Advertising won't grow membership, super funds toldBY JAMES FERNYHOUGH | WEDNESDAY, 3 SEP 2014 12:40PMSpending big on advertising may build brand awareness, but it has no effect on membership growth, according to research by CoreData. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Praemium's new leadership toughens earnings yardstick
Praemium's new leadership will be keeping a close eye on costs, with new chief executive Denis Orrock noting he will make sure the technology upgrade underway translates into stronger earnings and better returns for shareholders.
Australian Ethical FUM drops by $70m
Australian Ethical saw a net outflow of $100 million in its investment business in the first quarter of the financial year.
Perennial expands wholesale offer for pre-IPOs
Perennial Partners is launching a new strategy for wholesale investors to capitalise on global pre-IPO opportunities, requiring a minimum investment of $100,000.
Macquarie wealth investment chief to depart
Macquarie chief investment officer for wealth will take on a new role at a New Zealand-based investment management firm after serving in the position for close to three years.
Further Reading
Products
Featured Profile

David Sharpe
CHAIRMAN
FINANCIAL ADVICE ASSOCIATION AUSTRALIA
FINANCIAL ADVICE ASSOCIATION AUSTRALIA
A family man, business owner, cricket fanatic and financial adviser, David Sharpe has many facets. One of his biggest legacies, as he steps down as chair of the Financial Advice Association Australia, is leaving the profession stronger than he found it.







It appears the research results from CoreData negates the commentary from various Industry Super Funds that attempted to justify very large financial commitment to advertising programs across all facets of media, sporting team sponsorship and events for the reason that the spend was to build brand awareness which resulted in increased membership and which in-turn lead to cost efficiencies for all members based on volume and scale. In other words...."spend and they will come".
So, do the members of these funds appreciate the huge spend of their money on the building of their super funds brand with no direct resulting growth in membership?
Are the trustees of these funds approving this process in the knowledge that based on research, there is no quantifiable link between the financial commitment of members monies to advertising and an identifiable benefit flowing back to the members, other than their super funds logo is better recognised? Don't they have a primary responsibility to act in the best interest and to make decisions that benefit their members?