Advertising won't grow membership, super funds toldBY JAMES FERNYHOUGH | WEDNESDAY, 3 SEP 2014 12:40PMSpending big on advertising may build brand awareness, but it has no effect on membership growth, according to research by CoreData. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Equity Trustees super exit sparks Hejaz Islamic Super and Pension closure
Hejaz's Islamic Super and Pension products will be terminated as a fallout from Equity Trustees ditching the superannuation trustee business. The latter, however, says otherwise.
Sequoia revokes dividends, chief financial officer exits
Sequoia will not pay any dividends in the financial year, revoking interim dividend it had announced earlier in the year of one cent per share, as an adviser exodus puts pressure on its revenue.
Acclaim Wealth names chief executive
The Brisbane-based wealth and superannuation business has appointed a new chief executive, as former boss Terry Constable landed a new role at Infocus after almost three years at the helm.
Global X cuts fees on gold ETF
Global X has reduced fees on its Gold Bullion ETF, following in the footsteps of VanEck after it cut fees for its gold ETF last week.
Further Reading
Products
Featured Profile

Liza McDonald
HEAD OF RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT
AWARE SUPER
AWARE SUPER
Liza McDonald would have you believe her path from a legal secretary to the head of responsible investment at Aware Super was a matter of good fortune. Her career says otherwise. Riddhima Talwani writes.







It appears the research results from CoreData negates the commentary from various Industry Super Funds that attempted to justify very large financial commitment to advertising programs across all facets of media, sporting team sponsorship and events for the reason that the spend was to build brand awareness which resulted in increased membership and which in-turn lead to cost efficiencies for all members based on volume and scale. In other words...."spend and they will come".
So, do the members of these funds appreciate the huge spend of their money on the building of their super funds brand with no direct resulting growth in membership?
Are the trustees of these funds approving this process in the knowledge that based on research, there is no quantifiable link between the financial commitment of members monies to advertising and an identifiable benefit flowing back to the members, other than their super funds logo is better recognised? Don't they have a primary responsibility to act in the best interest and to make decisions that benefit their members?