Throw out relative performance tables: FinsiaBY MARK SMITH | THURSDAY, 11 SEP 2014 12:25PMThe way superannuation funds measure performance should be thrown out and replaced with a system which discourages short-termism and helps consumers think about their retirement pot as an income pool, rather than a pot of gold. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Australian Unity to shed 195 roles
|Australian Unity is reducing its workforce by 195 positions due to underperformance stemming from delays in government support for its Home Health platform and the integration of several businesses.
Count shutters limited-advice business, slips in size ranking
|Count Financial has reportedly wound up its restricted SMSF/limited-advice service, losing some 26 advisers on the Financial Adviser Register, latest data shows.
First Super recruits head of investments from Prime Super
|First Super has appointed a new head of investments, replacing Chris Artis, who was in the position for the past three months on an interim basis.
BMO eyes Euroz Hartleys' capital markets business
|Euroz Hartleys confirmed it is in discussions with Canada's BMO Financial Group for a potential sale of its capital markets business for $145 million.
Products
Featured Profile
David Woodall
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SUPERANNUATION
INSIGNIA FINANCIAL LTD
INSIGNIA FINANCIAL LTD
Facing his greatest test yet in metamorphosing MLC Super, Dave Woodall is adamant the juice will be worth the squeeze. Jamie Williamson writes.







I couldn't agree more. What needs to be thought of is the long term goals of the superannuant and how much risk do they: (a) need; (b) can they personally tolerate; (c) can their portfolio bear.
It is fine to be top of the tables, but how much risk should have been taken for the client, how much risk was taken to get these returns are very important questions.