Increased SG equals increased fees: ResearchBY ELIZA BAVIN | FRIDAY, 11 SEP 2020 12:29PMNew research from the University of Sydney suggests that raising the superannuation guarantee to 12% will send fees through the roof. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Future Group marks new successor fund transfer
|Future Group announced its Smart Future Trust will take on the GuildSuper and Child Care Super brands as the group continues to expand with another successor fund transfer.
HUB24 expands C-suite with innovation role
|HUB24 has strengthened its executive leadership team with the creation of a new chief operating and innovation officer role, bringing technology, innovation and strategy implementation under a broader remit.
Former director jailed for misuse of $1.75m
|Former Equitable Financial Solutions director Usman Siddiqui has been sentenced to six years and six months' imprisonment for dishonestly using his position as a director and misappropriating company funds.
PE giants partner with Nvidia for $709bn AI platform
|Apollo, BlackRock, Blackstone, Brookfield, Goldman Sachs and KKR have signed memorandum of understanding (MoU) with Nvidia to mobilise half a trillion US dollars ($709bn) of third-party capital to further accelerate the buildout of AI infrastructure.
Further Reading
Products
Featured Profile

Andrew Gregory
CHIEF ADVICE OFFICER
UNISUPER
UNISUPER
After 25 years, Andrew Gregory remains motivated by the impact financial advice can have on Australians' lives. As UniSuper's chief advice officer, he is not slowing down on any of his current ambitions. Matthew Wai writes.







Wow talk about unbalanced research. Yes if the fees were lower then they could earn more, but investing outside of superannuation still attracts fees and typically has a higher tax consequences. I dont know of any investments that you can make without incurring fees and charges. Even cash has a hidden fee in that the bank can loan the money at higher rates than they pay depositors. If the SG contributions do not increase are employees going to magically save additional money for retirement, even if this is outside of super?
Wow talk about unbalanced research. Yes if the fees were lower then they could earn more, but investing outside of superannuation still attracts fees and typically has a higher tax consequences. I dont know of any investments that you can make without incurring fees and charges. Even cash has a hidden fee in that the bank can loan the money at higher rates than they pay depositors. If the SG contributions do not increase are employees going to magically save additional money for retirement, even if this is outside of super?