False information undermining ASIC integrityBY KERRIE SYDEE | THURSDAY, 8 DEC 2016 12:26PMFalse information and misrepresentations made to ASIC are undermining the regulator's integrity, highlighting one of several concerns in its latest licensing activity report. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Advisers lean on AQF7 to meet education standards: Rainmaker
|A new report indicates that Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF) 7 qualifications are the most common forms of qualification among financial advisers, held by 85% of the population.
Labor commits to compulsory super for under-18 workers
|Labor has unanimously supported extending superannuation to under-18 Australian workers.
Trump slugs Australia with new 'forced-labour' tariffs
|US President Donald Trump will slug trading partners, including Australia, with new tariffs of 10% to 12.5% on the premise of pressuring foreign governments to strengthen bans on "the importation of goods produced with forced labour."
Centuria quashes governance allegations amid fund downgrades
|Centuria Capital Group has swiftly provided a response to media reports suggesting that its exposure to the Bathla Group, a Sydney-based property constructor and developer, raised questions over its governance, following a downgrade of one of its private credit funds this week.
Further Reading
Products
Featured Profile

Hugh Killen
MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY LIMITED
AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY LIMITED
For Hugh Killen, several life lessons came from spending time on pastoral properties stretching across northern New South Wales and South-West Queensland.







I fail to see how false information can be seen to be undermining ASIC integrity. Surely this is the job of ASIC and its licensing program. Finding out the shysters and scam artists before they get a chance to enter the industry, blocking their entry, and accepting those of good reputation who can then join the rest, doing a great job, with complete integrity.
ASIC should focus on meeting its service charter, not complaining because it has to do its job (refuse applications to non-suitable people).
ASIC had 36 months to prepare for this flood of applicants just like the rest of the industry and are now complaining because they didn't have resources for the last 12 months!
A more accurate set of statistics from ASIC would be the service charter statistics for each month of the program, not just focus on the last (fully predictable) rush to license.
That number would really show the efficiency of ASIC.