False information undermining ASIC integrityBY KERRIE SYDEE | THURSDAY, 8 DEC 2016 12:26PMFalse information and misrepresentations made to ASIC are undermining the regulator's integrity, highlighting one of several concerns in its latest licensing activity report. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Australian dividend distributions rebound in Q3
|Australia saw a significant rebound in dividend distributions in the quarter to September 30, with the recovery attributable to BHP and the broader mining sector.
Aequitas hires from Vanguard again
|Aequitas Investment Partners has named a head of asset consulting, joining from Vanguard Australia.
RBA delivers another hike in split decision
|The Reserve Bank of Australia delivered its fifth interest rate hike this year, but the monetary board was split in its decision.
Sequoia profits tank as advisers flee
|Sequoia's Q1 revenue dropped close to 60% while also recording a profit loss. Despite this former chief executive Garry Crole took home more than $400k.
Further Reading
Products
Expert Feed
Featured Profile

Jacqueline Fernley
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
Jacqueline Fernley is a self-confessed nerd, a market animal and as of this year, her own boss. Riddhima Talwani writes.







I fail to see how false information can be seen to be undermining ASIC integrity. Surely this is the job of ASIC and its licensing program. Finding out the shysters and scam artists before they get a chance to enter the industry, blocking their entry, and accepting those of good reputation who can then join the rest, doing a great job, with complete integrity.
ASIC should focus on meeting its service charter, not complaining because it has to do its job (refuse applications to non-suitable people).
ASIC had 36 months to prepare for this flood of applicants just like the rest of the industry and are now complaining because they didn't have resources for the last 12 months!
A more accurate set of statistics from ASIC would be the service charter statistics for each month of the program, not just focus on the last (fully predictable) rush to license.
That number would really show the efficiency of ASIC.