AMP defends hefty remuneration billBY ELIZABETH MCARTHUR | FRIDAY, 8 MAY 2020 12:48PMDuring the AMP annual general meeting chair David Murray defended the pay packet chief executive Francesco De Ferrari and the board continue to take home despite the company's woes. Related News |
Editor's Choice
ASIC sues First Guardian-linked auditors
ASIC has commenced proceedings against Auditeo Australia and two auditors for their involvement in the First Guardian Master Fund failure.
Acclime acquires Melbourne's Polar 993
Acclime, a provider of corporate, governance, advisory and fund services across Asia Pacific and global markets, has signed an agreement to acquire the independent trustee and fund administration business from Melbourne.
Platforms are not solution providers: AZ NGA
AZ NGA group chief executive Paul Barrett warned platforms should stay in their lane rather than overstep to improve financial adviser productivity, reiterating that it is the advice business' responsibility to do so.
Nesta pulls $247m mandate from Northern Trust over climate stance
UK research and innovation foundation Nesta Trust has transferred £120 million ($247m) of assets from Northern Trust Asset Management to Amundi after the US manager withdrew from major global climate initiatives, highlighting the growing commercial consequences of fund managers stepping back from climate ...
Further Reading
Products
Featured Profile

Hugh Killen
MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY LIMITED
AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY LIMITED
For Hugh Killen, several life lessons came from spending time on pastoral properties stretching across northern New South Wales and South-West Queensland.







An average Australian household, given $1.5m to own a home, fixtures and fittings and a car (or 2 cars), plus $2.5m to invest for a passive income, would be setup for a secure and very comfortable life. That's $4m, max..
How then do we justify - morally or commercially - annual executive paypackets of many multiples of this figure?
Secondly, notable that the question was 'How many customers has AMP lost?' rather than 'How many Clients were left without the care and guidance of a financial adviser?'
As for the 'sell-off' of a national asset, maybe boardmembers would gain some insight as to what the real purpose of the business is, by revisiting AMP's original mission: 'for the benefit of the widows and orphans of Sydney Town'.
Perhaps a refocus on delivering financial security to our fellow Australians, rather than on so-called 'Wealth Management'.
But would that deliver seven and eight figure executive paypackets?