Women need 7% more superBY JAMES FERNYHOUGH | FRIDAY, 2 AUG 2013 12:30PMWomen's superannuation contribution rates would need to be 7% higher than men's in order to achieve gender equality, a study has found. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Australia, UK partner to procure well-regulated financial markets
Following its inaugural meeting in September 2025, the second UK-Australia Joint Financial Regulatory Forum took place this week, with Australia remaining vocal about placing greater emphasis on governance and asset valuation of private markets.
Count takes 30% stake in Brisbane advice firm
Count has agreed to acquire a 30% stake in Brisbane-based accounting and financial advice firm Apiary Financial, continuing its push to expand its equity partnership network while reporting stronger first-quarter earnings.
Audit quality continues to fall short: ASIC
The corporate regulator has called for improvements in audit quality and financial reporting after its latest surveillance found companies, including superannuation funds, are still not getting the fundamentals right.
ETFs entering 3.0 era: JPMAM
JPMAM believes thematic ETFs may become a thing of the past as actively managed ETFs become more prevalent.
Further Reading
Products
Expert Feed
Featured Profile

Jacqueline Fernley
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
Jacqueline Fernley is a self-confessed nerd, a market animal and as of this year, her own boss. Riddhima Talwani writes.







The real issue here still seems to be one of equal pay for equal work. Its ridiculous in this day and age that women are still paid less for doing the same job. This needs to be fixed yesterday, as it is a very real form of discrimination. The rest though is really about choices. Hard choices to be sure, and I don't trivialise them. But choices rarely come without cost, and reduced superannuation saving after taking 5 years off work, would be one of them.
As for whether women should try to make up the gap by adjusting for higher risk investment strategies - that is a very slippery slope, fraught with uncertainty, and possibly inappropriate in many circumstances. Whether it spans the social equity gap depends on whether the assumptions you've made while constructing models in the safety of theoretical ruminations hold true.
Alternatively, women could insist that during their maternity leave, their partner's superannuation is equally split between the couple's funds.