Tax retirement earnings at flat 15%, says consultantBY JAMES FERNYHOUGH | THURSDAY, 31 JUL 2014 12:25PMA flat 15% tax on post-retirement investment earnings would solve the problem of lost tax revenue through self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs), according to Andrew Baker, managing partner at Tria Investment Partners. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Ausbil shutters $27m long short fund
|Ausbil Investment Management has shuttered its Long Short Focus Fund, with $27 million in funds under management (FUM).
Ageing dynamics require holistic retirement planning: La Trobe
|As more Australians enter retirement, the phase increasingly resembles a "distinct" economic life cycle, making better retirement planning essential rather than just an opportunity for financial advisers.
Aware Super elevates data and AI with new promotions
|Artificial intelligence (AI)and data analytics are becoming increasingly central to investment decision-making, with Aware Super reshaping its investment leadership to strengthen how technology informs portfolio strategy.
Challenger open to TAL takeover at a better price
|Challenger will continue to engage with TAL Daiichi Life to get a better offer price, after it rejected the takeover bid earlier this week, stating the offer falls short of a level it could recommend to shareholders.
Further Reading
Products
Expert Feed
Featured Profile

Jacqueline Fernley
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
Jacqueline Fernley is a self-confessed nerd, a market animal and as of this year, her own boss.







re the proposal to tax SMSF earnings at 15%, can we assume the same rate will apply to the earnings in pension phase of the Industry Funds? And why would the tax on realised capital gains be higher in Pension phase than in accumulation phase (at 10%).
Also why are franking credits so much more of an issue for SMSF than the other types of funds?
Are we serious about discriminating between funds, individuals etc as to who gets the benefit of the franking credit?