Editor's Choice
Ausbil shutters $27m long short fund
Ausbil Investment Management has shuttered its Long Short Focus Fund, with $27 million in funds under management (FUM).
Ageing dynamics require holistic retirement planning: La Trobe
As more Australians enter retirement, the phase increasingly resembles a "distinct" economic life cycle, making better retirement planning essential rather than just an opportunity for financial advisers.
Aware Super elevates data and AI with new promotions
Artificial intelligence (AI)and data analytics are becoming increasingly central to investment decision-making, with Aware Super reshaping its investment leadership to strengthen how technology informs portfolio strategy.
Challenger open to TAL takeover at a better price
Challenger will continue to engage with TAL Daiichi Life to get a better offer price, after it rejected the takeover bid earlier this week, stating the offer falls short of a level it could recommend to shareholders.
Further Reading
Products
Expert Feed
When geopolitics becomes a portfolio risk
Geopolitics is back - again - and Australian investors can no longer treat it as distant background noise.
Does association membership still matter?
With all the changes the advice sector has experienced in recent years, such as regulatory reform and increased education and professional standards ...
Digital assets and where they stand in 2026
So far in 2026 digital assets have captured the headlines largely for the wrong reasons, but that doesn't tell the full story.
Rethinking default design in a changing market environment
The evolution underway in the US DC system highlights the value of periodically reassessing default design assumptions.
Featured Profile
Jacqueline Fernley
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
ARC POINT OCIO PTY LTD
Jacqueline Fernley is a self-confessed nerd, a market animal and as of this year, her own boss. Riddhima Talwani writes.
The Financial Standard podcast Tune in each week as we discuss the latest developments in Australia's wealth management industry. |  |
What a surprise that SMSF members are satisfied with the vehicle that they chose :)
Calculating performance as $ is not really comparing apples to apples, because you'd expect that SMSF's by their very nature to generally have higher balances than their industry fund and retail counterparts.
Of course a SMSF owner will be happier if their super fund grew by $100k* from $500k to $600k, compared to a retail/industry fund members who's balance grew by $10k (assuming no contributions) from $50k to $60k. After all that's a $90k better 'performance' yet still both returned 20%.
I appreciate that you can not properly compare by % because no SMSF is the same, buts its still wrong to say that SMSF are happier with performance because the measure is wrong/false.